Recent Changes for "Cool Houses/Talk" - Rochester Wiki

Cool Houses/Talk

bonnev659 — 2012-07-20T21:41:48Z

Comment added.

Differences for Cool Houses/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
	+ ------ + ''2012-07-20 17:41:48'' [[nbsp]] some pretty sweet homes. thanks for posting the pictures --["Users/bonnev659"]

EileenF — 2012-02-04T19:13:56Z

Comment added.

Differences for Cool Houses/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
	+ ------ + ''2012-02-04 14:13:56'' [[nbsp]] I feel like including addresses is kind of a sketchy thing to do. I don't want to intrude too much on people's private property. --["Users/EileenF"]

EileenF — 2012-02-04T19:12:53Z

Differences for Cool Houses/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- The house you show at 160 S Fitzhugh St was renovated to look like that in the early '90s by the architect who owned it (don't remember his name or know if he still lives there). Surprisingly, he was a member of the Rochester Preservation Board at the time he did it (don't know if he still is), and the other members considered it a real stick-in-the-eye as well as an insult. Why not add the addresses of all the houses shown? ''Moved from the main page.''	+ '''(Moved from the main page.)''' The house you show at 160 S Fitzhugh St was renovated to look like that in the early '90s by the architect who owned it (don't remember his name or know if he still lives there). Surprisingly, he was a member of the Rochester Preservation Board at the time he did it (don't know if he still is), and the other members considered it a real stick-in-the-eye as well as an insult. Why not add the addresses of all the houses shown?

EileenF — 2012-02-04T19:12:06Z

Differences for Cool Houses/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ This page is for discussing the contents of ["Cool Houses"]. + + [[Comments]] + + The house you show at 160 S Fitzhugh St was renovated to look like that in the early '90s by the architect who owned it (don't remember his name or know if he still lives there). Surprisingly, he was a member of the Rochester Preservation Board at the time he did it (don't know if he still is), and the other members considered it a real stick-in-the-eye as well as an insult. Why not add the addresses of all the houses shown? ''Moved from the main page.''