Recent Changes for "Recent Changes/Talk" - Rochester Wiki

Recent Changes/Talk

peteb — 2016-03-12T02:26:07Z

Revert to version 29 (spam).

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

No differences found!

Recent Changes/Talk

monsterhots — 2013-10-08T23:58:56Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 44:	Line 44:
	+ ------ + ''2013-10-08 19:58:56'' [[nbsp]] I cannot find the way to add my business to Street Meat list monster hots --["Users/monsterhots"]

Recent Changes/Talk

DavidZipeto — 2013-09-05T02:57:26Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 42:	Line 42:
	+ ------ + ''2013-09-04 22:57:26'' [[nbsp]] Guess what? Rochester is one of the places visited by Columbia in BioShock Infinite. --["Users/DavidZipeto"]

Recent Changes/Talk

Damiankumor — 2012-01-12T18:56:50Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 40:	Line 40:
	+ ------ + ''2012-01-12 13:56:50'' [[nbsp]] That's been brought up at wiki meetings several times. The short answer is not with the current software, but there is an effort to move to a newer system that can do that. --["Users/DamianKumor"]

Recent Changes/Talk

AnnalisaIannone — 2012-01-12T18:13:50Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
	+ ------ + ''2012-01-12 13:13:50'' [[nbsp]] Would it be possible to reverse the order of the comments so the newest comments were at the top of the page? It saves time when reading reviews as the newer comments seem to be most relevant. Thanks! --["Users/AnnalisaIannone"]

Recent Changes/Talk

ReyTucker — 2010-08-28T21:55:39Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 36:	Line 36:
	+ ------ + ''2010-08-28 17:55:39'' [[nbsp]] It may interest you to know that most Canadians in 2036 are some of the most efficient, ruthless and dangerous people I know. God help Quebec. --["Users/RyanTucker"]

Recent Changes/Talk

EdwardKeith — 2010-08-08T17:03:29Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 34:	Line 34:
	+ ------ + ''2010-08-08 13:03:29'' [[nbsp]] I am seeking a Discrimination/work place Lawyer. I live in Niagara County. Job dismissal happened in Erie County. I have a case... need help. unique and complicated but documented. --["Users/EdwardKeith"]

Recent Changes/Talk

peteb — 2010-07-21T19:31:21Z

removed dupe comment

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 34:	Line 34:
- ------ - ''2010-07-21 15:28:03'' [[nbsp]] does anyone remember a band who play in the early 80's named video? they played at the riverboat (off east river road) quite a bit. All members of the band were married - though I don't really think that is important, unusual maybe. - --["Users/ksmith"]

Recent Changes/Talk

ksmith — 2010-07-21T19:28:03Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 34:	Line 34:
	+ ------ + ''2010-07-21 15:28:03'' [[nbsp]] does anyone remember a band who play in the early 80's named video? they played at the riverboat (off east river road) quite a bit. All members of the band were married - though I don't really think that is important, unusual maybe. + --["Users/ksmith"]

Recent Changes/Talk

ksmith — 2010-07-21T19:27:21Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 31:	Line 31:
	+ ------ + ''2010-07-21 15:27:21'' [[nbsp]] does anyone remember a band who play in the early 80's named video? they played at the riverboat (off east river road) quite a bit. All members of the band were married - though I don't really think that is important, unusual maybe. + --["Users/ksmith"]

Recent Changes/Talk

JackGreenky — 2010-04-04T13:06:55Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
	+ ------ + ''2010-04-04 09:06:55'' [[nbsp]] Can there be a way for the person who adds a change to edit just their own comment on what they just added, when one is missing or they make a typo? --["Users/JackGreenky"]

Recent Changes/Talk

peteb — 2008-10-17T19:59:04Z

removed the concern from Stefan over awarebear-it's already on awarebear's page

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
- ------ - ''2008-10-17 11:14:30'' [[nbsp]] The AwareBear spam that's mentions here is probably the least of the trouble presented by that company. It appears they present themselves using deceptive marketing. Recently they stole one of the images of my website (of my somewhat famous home office) and pasted an individual in there, then printed brochures with it and distributed them in Rochester. You can read the full details on the following page: http://www.stefandidak.com/awarebear.html --["Users/Stefan"]

Recent Changes/Talk

Stefan — 2008-10-17T15:14:30Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
	+ ------ + ''2008-10-17 11:14:30'' [[nbsp]] The AwareBear spam that's mentions here is probably the least of the trouble presented by that company. It appears they present themselves using deceptive marketing. Recently they stole one of the images of my website (of my somewhat famous home office) and pasted an individual in there, then printed brochures with it and distributed them in Rochester. You can read the full details on the following page: http://www.stefandidak.com/awarebear.html --["Users/Stefan"]

Recent Changes/Talk

StephenMoore — 2008-05-02T12:46:06Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 27:	Line 27:
	+ ------ + ''2008-05-02 07:46:06'' [[nbsp]] Is anybody looking for a salesforce consultant? --["StephenMoore"]

Recent Changes/Talk

nathanhenderson — 2008-04-09T22:41:20Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 24:	Line 24:
	+ ------ + ''2008-04-09 17:41:20'' [[nbsp]] Sheesh, what a wacky day. The AwareBear spam and all the other + vandalism -- unreal. Great job RocWiki members & admins! --["NathanHenderson"]

Recent Changes/Talk

DottieHoffmann — 2008-04-09T21:51:19Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 22:	Line 22:
	+ ------ + ''2008-04-09 16:51:19'' [[nbsp]] It was somewhat humorous, however big thanks to everyone who was keeping an eye on things and getting everything back in line after the damage, nice work --["DottieHoffmann"]

Recent Changes/Talk

alexandergartley — 2008-04-09T19:21:51Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 20:	Line 20:
	+ ------ + ''2008-04-09 14:21:51'' [[nbsp]] Although the harrasment today on the Recent Changes page was I'm sure no fun for the people it was directed at, I sat back on the sidelines and found it mildly humorous. --["AlexanderGartley"]

Recent Changes/Talk

FarMcKon — 2006-07-19T23:22:25Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
	+ ------ + ''2006-07-19 16:22:25'' [[nbsp]] If photos of yours, that you have not licensed as Creative Common in a way we can use, are being used, then we need to fix that. We should not be using unlicensed photos. --["FarMcKon"]

Recent Changes/Talk

RickUrwin — 2006-07-19T03:54:30Z

Linked to an example of a credited CC work.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- ''2006-07-18 20:23:35'' [[nbsp]] If photos are CC licensed then they can be used provided the work is credited. Most of my photos, some of which appear on RocWiki, are CC licensed ''Attribution / Non Commercial / Share Alike'' which means anyone can use them for any reason, alter them and re-share them provide they don’t make money on them and they attribute them even if they only use a small part of a photo. Works that require permission are generally "All rights reserved" copyrighted. So Yes, it's common practice to use CC lic work. See [http://creativecommons.org/ creativecommons.org] for more. --["RickUrwin" Rick]	+ ''2006-07-18 20:23:35'' [[nbsp]] If photos are CC licensed then they can be used provided the work is credited. Most of my photos, some of which appear on RocWiki, are CC licensed ''Attribution / Non Commercial / Share Alike'' which means anyone can use them for any reason, alter them and re-share them provide they don’t make money on them and they ["Car Cleaning" attribute] them even if they only use a small part of a photo. Works that require permission are generally "All rights reserved" copyrighted. So Yes, it's common practice to use CC lic work. See [http://creativecommons.org/ creativecommons.org] for more. --["RickUrwin" Rick]

Recent Changes/Talk

RickUrwin — 2006-07-19T03:30:46Z

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
- ''2006-07-18 20:23:35'' [[nbsp]] If your photos are CC licensed then from what I understand they can be used provided the work is credited. Most of my photos, many of which are on RocWiki are CC licensed Attribution / Non Commercial / Share Alike which means anyone can use them for any reason, alter them and re-share them provide they don’t make money on them and they attribute them even if they only use a small part of a photo. Works that require permission are generally "All rights reserved" copyrighted. --["RickUrwin"]	+ ''2006-07-18 20:23:35'' [[nbsp]] If photos are CC licensed then they can be used provided the work is credited. Most of my photos, some of which appear on RocWiki, are CC licensed ''Attribution / Non Commercial / Share Alike'' which means anyone can use them for any reason, alter them and re-share them provide they don’t make money on them and they attribute them even if they only use a small part of a photo. Works that require permission are generally "All rights reserved" copyrighted. So Yes, it's common practice to use CC lic work. See [http://creativecommons.org/ creativecommons.org] for more. --["RickUrwin" Rick]

Recent Changes/Talk

RickUrwin — 2006-07-19T03:26:01Z

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
-
Line 18:	Line 17:
- ''2006-07-18 20:23:35'' [[nbsp]] If your photos are CC licensed then from what I understand they can be used provided the work is credited. Most of my photos, many of which are on RocWiki are CC licensed Attribution / Non Commercial / Share Alike which means anyone can use them for any reason, alter them and re-share them provide they don’t make money on them and they attribute them even if they only use a small part of a photo. --["RickUrwin"]	+ ''2006-07-18 20:23:35'' [[nbsp]] If your photos are CC licensed then from what I understand they can be used provided the work is credited. Most of my photos, many of which are on RocWiki are CC licensed Attribution / Non Commercial / Share Alike which means anyone can use them for any reason, alter them and re-share them provide they don’t make money on them and they attribute them even if they only use a small part of a photo. Works that require permission are generally "All rights reserved" copyrighted. --["RickUrwin"]

Recent Changes/Talk

RickUrwin — 2006-07-19T03:23:35Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 17:	Line 17:
	+ ------ + ''2006-07-18 20:23:35'' [[nbsp]] If your photos are CC licensed then from what I understand they can be used provided the work is credited. Most of my photos, many of which are on RocWiki are CC licensed Attribution / Non Commercial / Share Alike which means anyone can use them for any reason, alter them and re-share them provide they don’t make money on them and they attribute them even if they only use a small part of a photo. --["RickUrwin"]

Recent Changes/Talk

FarMcKon — 2005-12-10T01:18:35Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
- ''2005-12-09 15:52:09'' [[nbsp]] I hadn't realized that you could thumbnail the images, perhaps a note on the image upload page would help. Right now all there is a mention of "attachment:" --["TomMaszerowski"]	+ ''2005-12-09 15:52:09'' [[nbsp]] I hadn't realized that you could thumbnail the images, perhaps a note on the image upload page would help. Right now all there is a mention of "[[Image()]] --["TomMaszerowski"]
Line 15:	Line 15:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-09 23:18:35'' [[nbsp]] Ron, We try to keep people to posting pictures they took themselves, or pictures they know are public domain. If some pictures on here (yours or not) don't fit that, please let us know. --["FarMcKon"]

Recent Changes/Talk

RonMorales — 2005-12-09T23:45:08Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 13:	Line 13:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-09 21:45:08'' [[nbsp]] Creative Commons License: I noticed a couple of my photos have been posted here, that I did not post. Is this a common practice? --["RonMorales"]

Recent Changes/Talk

TomMaszerowski — 2005-12-09T17:52:09Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 11:	Line 11:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-09 15:52:09'' [[nbsp]] I hadn't realized that you could thumbnail the images, perhaps a note on the image upload page would help. Right now all there is a mention of "attachment:" --["TomMaszerowski"]

Recent Changes/Talk

RonMorales — 2005-12-09T17:11:22Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-09 15:11:22'' [[nbsp]] Yeah pardon the new guy, it's me stumbling about :) but I found some guides and I am good at copying html. I went back and tried to add comments but could not do so without making another change. --["RonMorales"]

Recent Changes/Talk

rottenchester — 2005-12-09T13:13:01Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-09 11:13:01'' [[nbsp]] The new photos are great. I made them thumbs because: Pages load faster; Captions help enhance the value of the photo; Layout is nicer with thumbs on the right and text on the left; Most pages have thumbs so we can be consistent. --["RottenChester"]

Recent Changes/Talk

MariahBetz — 2005-12-09T02:19:48Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-09 00:19:48'' [[nbsp]] Another thing... I've noticed that a lot of the photos being added (which is awesome!) are large; how do people feel about thumb-nailing large images? --["MariahBetz"]

Recent Changes/Talk

MariahBetz — 2005-12-09T02:17:26Z

Comment added.

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-09 00:17:26'' [[nbsp]] Can we be more vigilant about adding a comment when we make a change? I see a lot of changes happening with no explanation whatsoever... --["MariahBetz"]

Recent Changes/Talk

MariahBetz — 2005-12-09T02:16:57Z

added comments field

Differences for Recent Changes/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ + [[Comments]]