Recent Changes for "Restaurants/Talk" - Rochester Wiki

Restaurants/Talk

alexandergartley — 2016-04-08T18:50:08Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 113:	Line 113:
	+ ------ + ''2016-04-08 14:50:08'' [[nbsp]] Can someone with access please replace the hyphen "-" in the first sentence with an em dash "—"? Thanks! --["Users/alexandergartley"]

Restaurants/Talk

JackGreenky — 2010-05-21T14:19:54Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 111:	Line 111:
	+ ------ + ''2010-05-21 10:19:54'' [[nbsp]] There is a Rochester Downtown Restaurants page, but it is not linked to the main Restaurants page - I cannot edit that page - admin? --["Users/JackGreenky"]

Restaurants/Talk

RyanPyle — 2010-04-25T19:19:25Z

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 111:	Line 111:
- ''2010-04-20 09:44:03'' [[nbsp]] Hi, I recently found reviews of FDR's Restaurant online, but don't see it on this site. - - Does anybody know if it is still open? If so, what is the price range for lunch or dinner entrees? - - Thanks. --["Users/RyanPyle"]

Restaurants/Talk

RyanPyle — 2010-04-20T13:44:03Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 110:	Line 110:
	+ ------ + ''2010-04-20 09:44:03'' [[nbsp]] Hi, I recently found reviews of FDR's Restaurant online, but don't see it on this site. + + Does anybody know if it is still open? If so, what is the price range for lunch or dinner entrees? + + Thanks. --["Users/RyanPyle"]

Restaurants/Talk

BradMandell — 2010-02-20T23:31:17Z

example layout change

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- Use the comments box to contribute.	+ Use the [#comments Comments Box] to contribute.
Line 5:	Line 5:
	+ Example of Suggested change to order of entries: + ---- + \|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Cheap Meals$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Diners$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Buffets$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\| + \|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Family Restaurant$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Casual Gourmet Restaurants$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Upscale Restaurants$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\| + \|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Rochester Cuisine$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Japanese Food$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Mexican Food$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\| + + ##\|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Take-Out Food$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Buffets$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\|<^33%>[[IncludePages(^Rochester Cuisine$,3,sort=ascending,items=1)]]\|\| + + [[Anchor(comments)]]

Restaurants/Talk

BradMandell — 2010-02-20T13:50:06Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 99:	Line 99:
	+ ------ + ''2010-02-20 08:50:06'' [[nbsp]] I am creating a ["Family Restaurants"] page to provide an alternative to the ["Diners"] list, which contains lots of places that are really not Diners - see also {"Diners/Talk"] for further discussion. --["Users/BradMandell"]

Restaurants/Talk

BradMandell — 2009-06-06T22:49:24Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 97:	Line 97:
	+ ------ + ''2009-06-06 18:49:24'' [[nbsp]] Consider it done - ["Alfresco Dining"] is now created and partially populated. Help fill it in (:>) --["Users/BradMandell"]

Restaurants/Talk

michaelbrisson — 2009-06-06T20:10:28Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 95:	Line 95:
	+ ------ + ''2009-06-06 16:10:28'' [[nbsp]] I tried to add a page for restaurants that offer al fresco dining, but didn't have the skills to pull it off. I think this would be a nice addition. --["Users/MichaelBrisson"]

Restaurants/Talk

DanetteFitzgerald — 2009-05-02T14:39:18Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 93:	Line 93:
	+ ------ + ''2009-05-02 10:39:18'' [[nbsp]] it would be useful to have a map view of restaurants, so one can choose a restaurant based on location --["Users/DanetteFitzgerald"]

Restaurants/Talk

BradMandell — 2009-04-14T20:51:59Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 91:	Line 91:
	+ ------ + ''2009-04-14 16:51:59'' [[nbsp]] See ["Restaurants/Talk/RestAlc"] for wiki linked list of entries with Alchol but not Restaurant. I am not sure exactly what was hoped for from the list. See that page for further comment on the subject. --["Users/BradMandell"]

Restaurants/Talk

peteb — 2009-02-04T04:48:33Z

redacted name/delinked KC-closed

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 23:	Line 23:
- ''2006-08-04 18:46:52'' [[nbsp]] I started trying to clean up the hours to make them look uniform and professional (if possible)-also adding hours where not present. On my next day off of work or weekend I'll call some places to get hours --["PeterBoulay"]	+ ''2006-08-04 18:46:52'' [[nbsp]] I started trying to clean up the hours to make them look uniform and professional (if possible)-also adding hours where not present. On my next day off of work or weekend I'll call some places to get hours --["Users/PeteB"]
Line 63:	Line 63:
- ''2007-06-06 20:38:08'' [[nbsp]] Also, it may have been prudent to make sure that the Restaurants listed - under "Chain Restaurants" were in fact duplicated elsewhere before - deleting the entire category. Some of those establishments are no - longer listed at all on the Restaurants page. --["NathanHenderson"]	+ ''2007-06-06 20:38:08'' [[nbsp]] Also, it may have been prudent to make sure that the Restaurants listed under "Chain Restaurants" were in fact duplicated elsewhere before deleting the entire category. Some of those establishments are no longer listed at all on the Restaurants page. --["NathanHenderson"]
Line 88:	Line 85:
- ["KC Tea & Noodles"] \|\|[http://www.2taste.com/kcteaandnoodle/]\|\|	+ KC Tea & Noodles \|\|[http://www.2taste.com/kcteaandnoodle/]\|\|

Restaurants/Talk

MrRochester — 2009-01-16T17:00:35Z

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 76:	Line 76:
- ''2008-07-25 21:09:16'' [[nbsp]] I think we all agree with ["Users/SteveVogt" SteveVogt's] comment on ["Users/AlexanderGartley" AlexanderGartley's] profile regarding the sheer mess that Restaurants has become. Fixing it will be a bit of a challenge, because most of the content is actually imported from other pages. That means that if a restaurant is missing from the main page, it's also missing from the category page.	+ ''2008-07-25 21:09:16'' [[nbsp]] I think we all agree with ["Users/MrRochester" MrRochester's] comment on ["Users/AlexanderGartley" AlexanderGartley's] profile regarding the sheer mess that Restaurants has become. Fixing it will be a bit of a challenge, because most of the content is actually imported from other pages. That means that if a restaurant is missing from the main page, it's also missing from the category page.

Restaurants/Talk

MrRochester — 2009-01-14T20:28:01Z

name

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 93:	Line 93:
- ''2008-09-10 16:37:41'' [[nbsp]] Why dont you guys create templates? Ive never created a page, so perhaps Im speaking out my butt? But in the area where you create a page, the user could choose a template. You could offer a restaurant one, store one, golf course one, etc, etc. When someone chooses that template, the new place is automatically added to the overall restaurant, store, or golf course page. You wouldnt have to worry about modifying the pages later or adding the place to a list. The code would do that automatically for you. --["Users/SteveVogt"]	+ ''2008-09-10 16:37:41'' [[nbsp]] Why dont you guys create templates? Ive never created a page, so perhaps Im speaking out my butt? But in the area where you create a page, the user could choose a template. You could offer a restaurant one, store one, golf course one, etc, etc. When someone chooses that template, the new place is automatically added to the overall restaurant, store, or golf course page. You wouldnt have to worry about modifying the pages later or adding the place to a list. The code would do that automatically for you. --["Users/MrRochester"]

Restaurants/Talk

SteveVogt — 2008-09-10T20:37:41Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 92:	Line 92:
	+ ------ + ''2008-09-10 16:37:41'' [[nbsp]] Why dont you guys create templates? Ive never created a page, so perhaps Im speaking out my butt? But in the area where you create a page, the user could choose a template. You could offer a restaurant one, store one, golf course one, etc, etc. When someone chooses that template, the new place is automatically added to the overall restaurant, store, or golf course page. You wouldnt have to worry about modifying the pages later or adding the place to a list. The code would do that automatically for you. --["Users/SteveVogt"]

Restaurants/Talk

BradMandell — 2008-09-03T18:03:53Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 83:	Line 83:
	+ ------ + ''2008-09-03 14:03:53'' [[nbsp]] Here are the 2Taste that I pulled this afternoon, I don't know how many others may have been deleted previously: + ## Website Down\|\|[http://www.2taste.com/le_lemongrass.php 12/23/2005 2taste.com Review]\|\| + ## Website Down * [http://www.2taste.com/focus_jamesbrown.php 2taste article] + ["T P's"] - http://www.2taste.com/timothypatricks/\|\| + ["KC Tea & Noodles"] \|\|[http://www.2taste.com/kcteaandnoodle/]\|\| + ["Magnolias"] - \|\|[http://www.2taste.com/magnolias/]\|\| + ["Golden Port"] - COMMENT: ''You can read my review of this restaurant on the http://write.2taste.com/archives/26 at the 2taste blog.''["RobinCass"] + --["Users/BradMandell"]

Restaurants/Talk

BradMandell — 2008-09-03T17:23:39Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 81:	Line 81:
	+ ------ + ''2008-09-03 13:23:39'' [[nbsp]] Re 2Taste.com - Just talked with Bill Klingensmith, now of [http://www.mydarndest.com/ MyDarndest.com]. He was 2Taste.com, which dissolved due to business partnership issues. He may be willing to pull up the old data for some "data mining guru" to get some of it back into RocWiki. --["Users/BradMandell"]

Restaurants/Talk

DaveMahon — 2008-07-26T01:09:16Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 75:	Line 75:
	+ ------ + ''2008-07-25 21:09:16'' [[nbsp]] I think we all agree with ["Users/SteveVogt" SteveVogt's] comment on ["Users/AlexanderGartley" AlexanderGartley's] profile regarding the sheer mess that Restaurants has become. Fixing it will be a bit of a challenge, because most of the content is actually imported from other pages. That means that if a restaurant is missing from the main page, it's also missing from the category page. + + Perhaps our kindly admins could run a query against the database for entries '''NOT LIKE %restaurant% AND LIKE %alcohol%''' to help reduce the data set of these poor orphaned pages (which may not show up on our ["Orphaned Pages"] list) that need checked? + + Also, I occasionally rebalance the table for visual congruity, but have we reached the point where even this is inadequate? Do we just leave the page as a list and let people click through to find their preferred cuisine? --["Users/DaveMahon"]

Restaurants/Talk

RichChiavaroli — 2007-10-05T18:39:20Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 73:	Line 73:
	+ ------ + ''2007-10-05 14:39:20'' [[nbsp]] Will do. Just trying to play nice in the sand box :) --["RichChiavaroli"]

Restaurants/Talk

rottenchester — 2007-10-05T18:21:29Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 69:	Line 69:
	+ ------ + ''2007-10-05 14:21:29'' [[nbsp]] Here's the deal: if you think something is a good idea, just do it (tm). Create the page. If people hate it, you'll hear about it, but usually what happens is that others take your idea and change it in little ways to make it better. + + So, don't be shy. If you want a pubs category, make it. If you want a casual category, go for it. Don't be intimidated -- there's nothing to be scared of. --["RottenChester"]

Restaurants/Talk

RichChiavaroli — 2007-10-05T13:01:00Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 67:	Line 67:
	+ ------ + ''2007-10-05 09:01:00'' [[nbsp]] Listed under Diners is a section titled "Others", but it includes quite a few places that aren't diners. There seems to be a gap for restaurants that aren't really upscale but also aren't cheap/diners/etc. The one that sticks out is Hogans. Should there be a category page for "Casual"? I could also see a use for a "Burger Joint" page. We certainly have enough of them. --["RichChiavaroli"]

Restaurants/Talk

nathanhenderson — 2007-06-07T00:38:08Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 62:	Line 62:
	+ ------ + ''2007-06-06 20:38:08'' [[nbsp]] Also, it may have been prudent to make sure that the Restaurants listed + under "Chain Restaurants" were in fact duplicated elsewhere before + deleting the entire category. Some of those establishments are no + longer listed at all on the Restaurants page. --["NathanHenderson"]

Restaurants/Talk

nathanhenderson — 2007-06-06T19:13:13Z

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 59:	Line 59:
- ''2007-06-06 15:12:56'' [[nbsp]] OK, I mentioned this on the Pubs/Talk page, but I figure we should chat - about it here.	+ ''2007-06-06 15:12:56'' [[nbsp]] OK, I mentioned this on the Pubs/Talk page, but I figure we should chat about it here.
Line 62:	Line 61:
- I think we still need a Pubs category, if only to list local Bar & Grill's that - serve food. Not every location on the Bars page serves food, but those - that do deserve to be listed under Restaurants. --["NathanHenderson"]	+ I think we still need a Pubs category, if only to list local Bar & Grill's that serve food. Not every location on the Bars page serves food, but those that do deserve to be listed under Restaurants. --["NathanHenderson"]

Restaurants/Talk

nathanhenderson — 2007-06-06T19:12:56Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 58:	Line 58:
	+ ------ + ''2007-06-06 15:12:56'' [[nbsp]] OK, I mentioned this on the Pubs/Talk page, but I figure we should chat + about it here. + + I think we still need a Pubs category, if only to list local Bar & Grill's that + serve food. Not every location on the Bars page serves food, but those + that do deserve to be listed under Restaurants. --["NathanHenderson"]

Restaurants/Talk

DaveMahon — 2007-06-06T05:57:46Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 52:	Line 52:
	+ ------ + ''2007-06-06 01:57:46'' [[nbsp]] Including small, salient portions of a review for criticism or comment (of the review) is probably fair use, provided it is attributed and a link is maintained as long as possible. + + That said, you're almost certainly safe if you create a narrative summary of what was said (eg. "Democrat & Chronicle food critic John Doe enjoyed the overall experience, but thought the steak was a little overdone. The cheesecake was, 'firm, moist and fresh,' which contributed greatly to his 4 out of 5 star review. (Democrat & Chronicle; January 32, 2700; pp. C12)"). + + This satisfies clauses 3 and 4 of of US Code Title 17, Chapter 1, Paragraph 107. --["DaveMahon"]

Restaurants/Talk

nathanhenderson — 2007-06-06T04:35:18Z

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 47:	Line 47:
- ''2007-06-06 00:34:45'' [[nbsp]] Would it be appropriate (and/or legal) to put quotes from newspaper - reviews on our RocWiki pages?	+ ''2007-06-06 00:34:45'' [[nbsp]] Would it be appropriate (and/or legal) to put quotes from newspaper reviews on our RocWiki pages?
Line 50:	Line 49:
- Far too often, the D&C and other publications change their web links, - breaking our links here.	+ Far too often, the D&C and other publications change their web links, breaking our links here.
Line 53:	Line 51:
- At least a posting a summary or conclusion of a review would get the - reviewer's opinion across, and I believe that's OK according to current - copyright law. --["NathanHenderson"]	+ At least a posting a summary or conclusion of a review would get the reviewer's opinion across, and I believe that's OK according to current copyright law. --["NathanHenderson"]

Restaurants/Talk

nathanhenderson — 2007-06-06T04:34:45Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 46:	Line 46:
	+ ------ + ''2007-06-06 00:34:45'' [[nbsp]] Would it be appropriate (and/or legal) to put quotes from newspaper + reviews on our RocWiki pages? + + Far too often, the D&C and other publications change their web links, + breaking our links here. + + At least a posting a summary or conclusion of a review would get the + reviewer's opinion across, and I believe that's OK according to current + copyright law. --["NathanHenderson"]

Restaurants/Talk

ChristineLeo — 2007-06-04T18:39:40Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 44:	Line 44:
	+ ------ + ''2007-06-04 14:39:40'' [[nbsp]] "Beale Street should be listed under Pub and Continental" - sorry, continental? --["ChristineLeo"]

Restaurants/Talk

AdrienneDahler — 2007-05-11T21:05:25Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 42:	Line 42:
	+ ------ + ''2007-05-11 17:05:25'' [[nbsp]] Also, there aren't any other cafés listed. Should we include a link to the Cafés page from the Restaurants page or is this something we want to keep completely separate? --["AdrienneDahler"]

Restaurants/Talk

AdrienneDahler — 2007-05-11T21:00:38Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 40:	Line 40:
	+ ------ + ''2007-05-11 17:00:38'' [[nbsp]] There's no link to ["Cibon"] on this page anywhere... what category should it go under? I've never eaten there but I noticed it was missing from this list even though there is a business-level page for it. --["AdrienneDahler"]

Restaurants/Talk

StevenDibelius — 2007-04-07T17:36:15Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 38:	Line 38:
	+ ------ + ''2007-04-07 13:36:15'' [[nbsp]] I agree with John's comment to remove phone numbers. Addresses should also probably be removed. In a related note, I think that the same cleanup should be done on the ["Automobile Mechanics"] page. --["StevenDibelius"]

Restaurants/Talk

JohnMoriello — 2007-04-07T13:09:57Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 36:	Line 36:
	+ ------ + ''2007-04-07 09:09:57'' [[nbsp]] A suggestion: Perhaps consider stripping phone numbers off of the cuisine index pages ("Italian Food," "Chinses Food," etc.) since that information already exists on the business-level pages. I raise this issue only because it's easy to forget to make changes on other layers of pages when info -- such as the phone number -- for a business changes. Admittedly, it doesn't happen often, but it does happen from time to time. I've lived through the nightmare a few times at DemocratandChronicle.com in non-database-driven directories. Just a thought. --["JohnMoriello"]

Restaurants/Talk

eastsidestephen — 2007-03-12T16:23:48Z

edit

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 35:	Line 35:
- ''2007-03-12 11:22:00'' [[nbsp]] I like where you're going with it Rochesterguy. Is there any way we can take advantage of the table of contents macro? Since it looks like it anchors to headings, is there any way to get headings into the restaurant page while still keeping artecture of the restaurant page similar to what it is (with 3 headings, and each category as an embedded page). --["EastSideStephen"]	+ ''2007-03-12 11:22:00'' [[nbsp]] I like where you're going with it Rochesterguy. Is there any way we can take advantage of the table of contents macro? Since it looks like it anchors to headings, can we insert headings into the restaurant page while still keeping arcitecture of the restaurant page similar to what it is (with 3 headings, and each category as an embedded page). This question is directed to anyone with more coding skill than I. --["EastSideStephen"]

Restaurants/Talk

eastsidestephen — 2007-03-12T16:22:00Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 34:	Line 34:
	+ ------ + ''2007-03-12 11:22:00'' [[nbsp]] I like where you're going with it Rochesterguy. Is there any way we can take advantage of the table of contents macro? Since it looks like it anchors to headings, is there any way to get headings into the restaurant page while still keeping artecture of the restaurant page similar to what it is (with 3 headings, and each category as an embedded page). --["EastSideStephen"]

Restaurants/Talk

rochesterguy — 2007-03-12T15:13:57Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 32:	Line 32:
	+ ------ + ''2007-03-12 10:13:57'' [[nbsp]] yes, please clean up this page. Perhaps we should simply list cuisine categories, which, upon clicking, would lead to its own menu (as it does now). --["RochesterGuy"]

Restaurants/Talk

FarMcKon — 2007-01-14T18:00:34Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 30:	Line 30:
	+ ------ + ''2007-01-14 13:00:34'' [[nbsp]] This page is a freakling include mess. Can someone help clean this up for user ease? --["FarMcKon"]

Restaurants/Talk

benmargolis — 2006-11-18T01:42:04Z

Fixed links in my comment

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
- ''2006-11-17 20:39:28'' [[nbsp]] How about this for a restaurant wiki page (from DavisWiki.org, the site whose software we use): ["http://www.daviswiki.org/Bistro_33"] and ["http://www.daviswiki.org/Bistro_33/Talk"] -- just wild. I wonder if this is the right evolution of the wiki restaurant page? --["BenMargolis"]	+ ''2006-11-17 20:39:28'' [[nbsp]] How about this for a restaurant wiki page (from Davis, California's DavisWiki.org, the site whose software we use): [http://www.daviswiki.org/Bistro_33] and [http://www.daviswiki.org/Bistro_33/Talk] -- just wild. I wonder if this is the right evolution of the wiki restaurant page? --["BenMargolis"]

Restaurants/Talk

benmargolis — 2006-11-18T01:39:28Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 28:	Line 28:
	+ ------ + ''2006-11-17 20:39:28'' [[nbsp]] How about this for a restaurant wiki page (from DavisWiki.org, the site whose software we use): ["http://www.daviswiki.org/Bistro_33"] and ["http://www.daviswiki.org/Bistro_33/Talk"] -- just wild. I wonder if this is the right evolution of the wiki restaurant page? --["BenMargolis"]

Restaurants/Talk

StevenDibelius — 2006-11-17T01:11:05Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 26:	Line 26:
	+ ------ + ''2006-11-16 20:11:05'' [[nbsp]] I think a table of contents would be helpful for quickly accessing different sections. It might also be good to have broader categories within which there are different types of cuisines, for example "East Asian" for Japanese, Chinese, Korean, etc. --["StevenDibelius"]

Restaurants/Talk

barbiejeanne — 2006-08-23T12:22:27Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 24:	Line 24:
	+ ------ + ''2006-08-23 05:22:27'' [[nbsp]] Can we maybe add an "American Food" category to this page? --["BarbieJeanne"]

Restaurants/Talk

peteb — 2006-08-05T01:46:52Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 22:	Line 22:
	+ ------ + ''2006-08-04 18:46:52'' [[nbsp]] I started trying to clean up the hours to make them look uniform and professional (if possible)-also adding hours where not present. On my next day off of work or weekend I'll call some places to get hours --["PeterBoulay"]

Restaurants/Talk

RickUrwin — 2006-07-17T19:09:14Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 20:	Line 20:
	+ ------ + ''2006-07-17 12:09:14'' [[nbsp]] Created a new page for helping people add more info into their restaurant pages. Hopefully this help spruce up those "yellow page" pages. ["Reviewing Restaurants"] --["RickUrwin"]

Restaurants/Talk

RickUrwin — 2006-07-06T22:20:58Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
	+ ------ + ''2006-07-06 15:20:58'' [[nbsp]] I agree. Users should feel free to edit the content of the wiki. True, sometimes it's a fine line where something should go but for the most part the comments section should be for opinion. Stating, "the dining room has a feng zhu feel" could be either but really if the author knows feng zhu then it's probably fair to say it belongs up above. --["RickUrwin"]

Restaurants/Talk

ShawnPorter — 2006-07-05T18:59:25Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
	+ ------ + ''2006-07-05 11:59:25'' [[nbsp]] A guideline or policy regarding putting opinions in restaurant write-ups would be nice. I would prefer to see opinion only in the Comments sections. --["ShawnPorter"]

Restaurants/Talk

JonRobins — 2005-12-06T14:00:13Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-06 12:00:13'' [[nbsp]] Looks like a good start, but then there's the time-consuming issue of editing each restaurant page to reflect what category it's in... possibly more work than it's worth :0 --["JonRobins"]

Restaurants/Talk

rottenchester — 2005-12-05T19:36:48Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-05 17:36:48'' [[nbsp]] Check out ["Restaurant Price Guide"]. Does that get somewhere towards what you're thinking? It doesn't have to be permanent -- just an idea to see what it looks like. --["RottenChester"]

Restaurants/Talk

JonRobins — 2005-12-05T14:59:03Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-05 12:59:03'' [[nbsp]] That's why we're talking about it, then- price range for "a meal" would be more informative but probably hard to judge- cheapskates like me getting an entree and a water, vs. someone doing an appetizer, a mixed drink, another beverage, an entree, and then dessert. The main reason I suggest it is that the current "upscale" and "cheap" pages aren't really that informative divisions. --["JonRobins"]

Restaurants/Talk

rottenchester — 2005-12-05T14:53:07Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-05 12:53:07'' [[nbsp]] Sure. Couple of questions. First, location. Should we put it on the page for the restaurant, on the "category page" (e.g., "Mexican", "Upscale"), or both? Second, meaning: what does "per meal" mean: entree, salad, dessert without drinks? I think we need to be pretty clear on that. --["RottenChester"]

Restaurants/Talk

JonRobins — 2005-12-04T15:41:59Z

Comment added.

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
	+ ------ + ''2005-12-04 13:41:59'' [[nbsp]] Is there any interest in creating a price scale for restaurants? Some page have a general range, but something like a generic $, $$, or $$$ system to indicate a rough price range might be nice. $=10, $$=15-20, $$$=20+ per entree or meal? --["JonRobins"]

Restaurants/Talk

JonRobins — 2005-12-04T15:40:44Z

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- [[comments]]	+ [[Comments]]

Restaurants/Talk

JonRobins — 2005-12-04T15:40:15Z

Created talk page, added comment

Differences for Restaurants/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ Restaurants Talk Page + + Use the comments box to contribute. + + [[comments]]