Recent Changes for "Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk" - Rochester Wiki

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

peteb — 2010-02-11T03:37:35Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 29:	Line 29:
	+ ------ + ''2010-02-10 22:37:35'' [[nbsp]] Gary-it was just announced today in a campus-wide email. All I told you is all I know. Can't speculate on summer as I don't know. --["Users/PeteB"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

GaryGocek — 2010-02-11T03:35:16Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 27:	Line 27:
	+ ------ + ''2010-02-10 22:35:16'' [[nbsp]] This RocWiki article refers to 4-quarters and 2-semesters. The RIT release doesn't say anything about summertime, but presumably RIT will continue to operate during the summer after switching to semesters. On the current quarter system, there are 4 quarters including the summer, so I guess that means that there will be 3 semesters including summer. I think the RocWiki article added some unclear info by saying that 4-quarters will be reduced to 2-semesters, but I don't know the correction. --["Users/GaryGocek"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

alainasomers — 2008-02-06T23:17:59Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 25:	Line 25:
	+ ------ + ''2008-02-06 18:17:59'' [[nbsp]] I'm curious to see why some of the parts of this page that come off badly haven't been fixed. I'm a bit hesitant to make changes myself, as I am a new user to RocWiki. --["AlainaSomers"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

EugeniaHuang — 2007-09-26T07:19:43Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 23:	Line 23:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-26 03:19:43'' [[nbsp]] Hrmm... that's a good point --["EugeniaHuang"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

StevenDibelius — 2007-09-26T06:29:25Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 21:	Line 21:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-26 02:29:25'' [[nbsp]] We should be careful putting up the RIT logo on RocWiki. RIT is VERY protective of it's trademarks, logos, etc. --["StevenDibelius"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

EugeniaHuang — 2007-09-25T22:42:25Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 19:	Line 19:
	+ ------ + ''2007-09-25 18:42:25'' [[nbsp]] I'm removing the photo because even though it might be funny at first read, after a while, it's annoying to see. Not trying to be too encyclopedic but at the same time, if you want to be funny, there's probably a way to be funny without being so trite. --["EugeniaHuang"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

RyDahl — 2006-01-02T18:36:00Z

reply to will mullaney

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- == Talk Page== - This page is where differences in opinions about RocWiki pages are resolved, and notes are left from one contributor to another related to content.	+ * ''Wikis, to be useful, should be filled with information, not personal feelings. ["WillMullaney"]'' + * But they are much more fun with snide humorous remarks embedded in it. Let's not make rocwiki completely dry. --["RyDahl"] +

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

FarMcKon — 2005-10-07T12:03:41Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
	+ ------ + ''2005-10-07 05:03:41'' [[nbsp]] I don't think anyone working on the wiki is attempting to be rude, I just think humor that comes off OK in person can come off wrong in typing. That is why the wiki is open for anyone to edit. (And is also why Rob is creating a 'Editors Board' to have some kind of final decision makers in such cases). --["FarMcKon"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

AndrewWheeland — 2005-10-05T18:04:30Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
	+ ------ + ''2005-10-05 11:04:30'' [[nbsp]] Perhaps it would be appropriate to add an Opinions page about any given establishment where people could post pro & con opinions/insights. I'm certainly not against humor... Don't get me wrong. But I am for RocWiki being looked upon as an informative resource instead of stomping grounds of a bunch of (in FarMcKon's words) mean-spirited people. --["AndrewWheeland"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

FarMcKon — 2005-10-05T16:45:58Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 12:	Line 12:
	+ ------ + ''2005-10-05 09:45:58'' [[nbsp]] I also agree, and I was a bit put off by the page. I'm sure it was not intended that way, but it comes off as a bit mean spirited. --["FarMcKon"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

RobertPolyn — 2005-10-05T16:37:44Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+ ------ + ''2005-10-05 09:37:44'' [[nbsp]] In my opinion: Rocwiki is intended to be a comprehensive guide to the area in a way that other guides fall short. We're not striving for an overall neutral point of view or anything resembling objectivity. We want to reflect and give voice to opinion, individual understandings of the area that might otherwise be lost. While factual information should have priority on any page, we highly value opinion---and humor where it works. A good page to review might be the ["Democrat & Chronicle"]. Read over the discussion at the bottom and check out the revision history. I think that disagreement came to a reasonable conclusion. Go by your own instincts though, if you feel that useful information (including opinion) is being obscured, then don't drop this issue. Diversity of opinion is a goal of the wiki, include your own and help make the site stronger. --["RobertPolyn"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

JonRobins — 2005-10-05T16:29:46Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
	+ ------ + ''2005-10-05 09:29:46'' [[nbsp]] I'd agree. It's okay to be witty and humorous as long as you are being at least semi-factutal. See the spy bar page for what I think is a good use of humor mixed with valid information (or clever misinformation! who knows!) --["JonRobins"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

AndrewWheeland — 2005-10-05T15:38:18Z

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 7:	Line 7:
- ''2005-10-05 08:37:56'' [[nbsp]] My impression is that RocWiki is intended to be developed into a comprehensive guide to Rochester. If I'm wrong and it's meant to be a humor site, then my apologies. None of the other schools informational pages are filled with wise-cracks about the make-up of the student body and about the design of the campus. What do other think? --["AndrewWheeland"]	+ ''2005-10-05 08:37:56'' [[nbsp]] My impression is that RocWiki is intended to be developed into a comprehensive guide to Rochester. If I'm wrong and it's meant to be a humor site, then my apologies. None of the other schools informational pages are filled with wise-cracks about the make-up of the student body and about the design of the campus. What do others think? --["AndrewWheeland"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

AndrewWheeland — 2005-10-05T15:37:56Z

Comment added.

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
	+ ------ + ''2005-10-05 08:37:56'' [[nbsp]] My impression is that RocWiki is intended to be developed into a comprehensive guide to Rochester. If I'm wrong and it's meant to be a humor site, then my apologies. None of the other schools informational pages are filled with wise-cracks about the make-up of the student body and about the design of the campus. What do other think? --["AndrewWheeland"]

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

AndrewWheeland — 2005-10-05T15:37:52Z

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
- My impression is that RocWiki is intended to be developed into a comprehensive guide to Rochester. If I'm wrong and it's meant to be a humor site, then my apologies. None of the other schools informational pages are filled with wise-cracks about the make-up of the student body and about the design of the campus. What do other think?

Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

AndrewWheeland — 2005-10-05T15:37:20Z

Differences for Rochester Institute of Technology/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ == Talk Page== + This page is where differences in opinions about RocWiki pages are resolved, and notes are left from one contributor to another related to content. + + [[Comments(Talk about the parent page:)]] + + My impression is that RocWiki is intended to be developed into a comprehensive guide to Rochester. If I'm wrong and it's meant to be a humor site, then my apologies. None of the other schools informational pages are filled with wise-cracks about the make-up of the student body and about the design of the campus. What do other think?