Recent Changes for "Strange News/Talk" - Rochester Wiki

Strange News/Talk

jgerek — 2012-04-11T20:07:52Z

Comment added.

Differences for Strange News/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 16:	Line 16:
	+ ------ + ''2012-04-11 16:07:52'' [[nbsp]] All links now defunct, so little value here. Time for this page to go?? --["Users/JGerek"]

JasonOlshefsky — 2007-06-05T11:41:42Z

Comment added.

Differences for Strange News/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 9:	Line 9:
	+ ------ + ''2007-06-04 04:20:18'' [[nbsp]] I agree that it's a big problem. + + A short summary (a couple of sentences) would be fair use - how about that? + --["RottenChester"] + ------ + ''2007-06-05 07:41:42'' [[nbsp]] What's "Strange" mean anyway? It seems like a very subjective term to use. --["JasonOlshefsky"]

travisowens — 2007-06-04T13:42:55Z

Move comment from content page

Differences for Strange News/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 6:	Line 6:
- ''2007-06-04 09:41:19'' [[nbsp]] Creating PDFs or local caches of these new articles would mostly likely violate the newspaper's rights. I do like your idea but I doubt they would like us archiving their articles. I will admit this is also a big problem for restaurant reviews. --["TravisOwens"]	+ '''2007-06-02 23:59:01''' [[nbsp]] Could we have PDF's of articles in the future? A lot of these links don't work. --["EmilyYang"] + ------ + ''2007-06-04 09:41:19'' [[nbsp]] Creating local copies of other site's content would violate their rights. I do like your idea but I doubt they would like us archiving their articles. I will admit this is also a big problem for restaurant reviews. --["TravisOwens"]

travisowens — 2007-06-04T13:41:19Z

Comment added.

Differences for Strange News/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
	+ ------ + ''2007-06-04 09:41:19'' [[nbsp]] Creating PDFs or local caches of these new articles would mostly likely violate the newspaper's rights. I do like your idea but I doubt they would like us archiving their articles. I will admit this is also a big problem for restaurant reviews. --["TravisOwens"]

travisowens — 2007-06-04T13:40:11Z

Page creation

Differences for Strange News/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 5:	Line 5:
- ------ - '''2007-06-02 23:59:01''' [[nbsp]] Could we have PDF's of articles in the future? A lot of these links don't work. --["EmilyYang"] - ------ - ''2007-06-04 09:41:19'' [[nbsp]] Creating local copies of other site's content would violate their rights. I do like your idea but I doubt they would like us archiving their articles. I will admit this is also a big problem for restaurant reviews. --["TravisOwens"] - ------ - ''2007-06-04 04:20:18'' [[nbsp]] I agree that it's a big problem. - - A short summary (a couple of sentences) would be fair use - how about that? - --["RottenChester"]

rottenchester — 2007-06-04T08:20:18Z

Comment added.

Differences for Strange News/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ == Talk Page== + This page is where differences in opinions about RocWiki pages are resolved, and notes are left from one contributor to another related to content. + + [[Comments(Talk about the parent page:)]] + ------ + '''2007-06-02 23:59:01''' [[nbsp]] Could we have PDF's of articles in the future? A lot of these links don't work. --["EmilyYang"] + ------ + ''2007-06-04 09:41:19'' [[nbsp]] Creating local copies of other site's content would violate their rights. I do like your idea but I doubt they would like us archiving their articles. I will admit this is also a big problem for restaurant reviews. --["TravisOwens"] + ------ + ''2007-06-04 04:20:18'' [[nbsp]] I agree that it's a big problem. + + A short summary (a couple of sentences) would be fair use - how about that? + --["RottenChester"]