Recent Changes for "Users/BadFish" - Rochester Wiki

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2019-10-13T20:25:06Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 187:	Line 187:
	+ ------ + ''2019-10-13 16:25:06'' [[nbsp]] LivingStressFree is a local business FYI. Not setup properly but they are local --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

mkstu — 2019-04-30T20:15:59Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 185:	Line 185:
	+ ------ + ''2019-04-30 16:15:59'' [[nbsp]] Hi Badfish, I reverted your deletion of ["Filipino Martial Arts"] because creating it was done to meet the standard in the ["Martial Arts"] page. If the page isn't considered specific to Rochester, then all of the Martial Arts pages need to be deleted--or merged into it. Just letting you know in case I was the one that messed up. I'm new here and all. --["Users/mkstu"]

Users/BadFish

scotthendler — 2017-01-08T23:38:36Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 181:	Line 181:
	+ ------ + ''2017-01-08 18:38:36'' [[nbsp]] Badfish, I am fine with the change. We may want to look at the Painting with a twist page, as that has information about Roc, sip and paint. + + --["Users/scotthendler"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2015-11-11T17:07:32Z

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 180:	Line 180:
	+ * Shady doesn't even begin to explain what they do. You can pay to have bad reviews censored. --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2015-11-11T17:05:01Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 178:	Line 178:
	+ ------ + ''2015-11-11 12:05:01'' [[nbsp]] It was ["Users/PeteB"]'s idea. It's because Yelp is really shady in terms of review veracity and its interactions with small businesses. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

alexandergartley — 2015-10-30T14:49:30Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 176:	Line 176:
	+ ------ + ''2015-10-30 10:49:30'' [[nbsp]] I think you're right on Rory. It was a stretch to create that page :) --["Users/alexandergartley"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2015-10-27T09:42:39Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 174:	Line 174:
	+ ------ + ''2015-10-27 05:42:39'' [[nbsp]] Can you leave a comment on ["users/Marketing"]'s user page explaining the problem with their edits? I already did and they're not getting it. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2015-05-25T22:35:24Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 172:	Line 172:
	+ ------ + ''2015-05-25 18:35:24'' [[nbsp]] These pictures I just uploaded are all ones I took. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2014-12-18T06:25:55Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 170:	Line 170:
	+ ------ + ''2014-12-18 01:25:55'' [[nbsp]] FYI I left you an email from my gmail acct :) --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2014-10-03T05:56:23Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 168:	Line 168:
	+ ------ + ''2014-10-03 01:56:23'' [[nbsp]] Merge done --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2014-10-02T20:51:09Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 166:	Line 166:
	+ ------ + ''2014-10-02 16:51:09'' [[nbsp]] Yup. There's ["Studio 34 Bead and Jewelry Arts"]. I'd merge the two but I don't have time today. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2014-09-11T22:31:09Z

test

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 2:	Line 2:
	+ +

Users/BadFish

scotthendler — 2014-07-03T01:30:14Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 162:	Line 162:
	+ ------ + ''2014-07-02 21:30:14'' [[nbsp]] My comments about Hobby Lobby being anti-Semitic had nothing to do with the current issue and Supreme Court ruling. They have been known (in year past) to not supply any Jewish holiday merchandise in heavily populated Jewish areas, while supplying Christmas merchandise during the holiday season. When approached about the issue, some derogatory remarks about Jews were made. It was not until public pressure and lots of bad press that an apology was made. To me, that shows antisemitism. --["Users/scotthendler"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2014-06-30T15:14:10Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 160:	Line 160:
	+ ------ + ''2014-06-30 11:14:10'' [[nbsp]] No, I say we just fix them. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

jgerek — 2014-06-23T13:07:30Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 158:	Line 158:
	+ ------ + ''2014-06-23 09:07:30'' [[nbsp]] So for the king of the NPOV and no-SEO, how does the ["Rochester Candlelight Ghost Walks"] listing grab you? Along with all its subpages, redirects, pages-to-be, etc? --["Users/jgerek"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2014-06-19T05:30:36Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 156:	Line 156:
	+ ------ + ''2014-06-19 01:30:36'' [[nbsp]] I think you went overkill on ["Eldre Corporation"], badfish. They have a right to list individual manufacturing processes/procedures they perform. That's not marketing, that's just stating what they can do --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2014-06-12T19:39:22Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 154:	Line 154:
	+ ------ + ''2014-06-12 15:39:22'' [[nbsp]] Agreed. Let's lock it. Maybe make an alternative page for people who want to review it? --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

Damiankumor — 2014-05-21T14:06:53Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 152:	Line 152:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-21 10:06:53'' [[nbsp]] On the Kosher food page, put the Rabbi there. The restaurants can link to that page for Kosher. --["Users/Damiankumor"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2014-05-21T06:14:27Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 150:	Line 150:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-21 02:14:27'' [[nbsp]] My opinion--if a business/restaurant says they're kosher--it's good enough for me. If they're on the list--then that's fine to include them as well. --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2014-05-21T03:51:15Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 146:	Line 146:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 23:51:15'' [[nbsp]] I personally don't think the rabbi has anything to do with having it on the restaurant page. I think it has to do with how much of a focus it is by the restaurant/establishment. If they advertise themselves as having Kosher stuff, then cool, roll with it. Again I refer to the Owl House/Vegan example. A listing on the establishment page comes from the establishment showing this as a focus rather as just an option. + + To throw a wrench into everything, I'd say if you want every page that has Kosher stuff to list that it has Kosher stuff, then let's talk about whether Kosher/Gluten-free/Vegan/Lactose-free/etc should be added to the defining items of an establishment, just like address, hours, alcohol, handicapped accessibility. etc. are now. I don't like that and would disagree, but can see how this debate naturally raises that possibility. --["Users/badfish"]

Users/BadFish

sdubois — 2014-05-21T03:35:38Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 144:	Line 144:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 23:35:38'' [[nbsp]] How about we include kosher supervision info on pages for establishments that actually have kosher supervision? For example, Rita's has supervision from a local Rabbi, whereas Ben and Jerry's does not. It should be noted that every certified kosher establishment in Rochester already has their kosher information mentioned on their pages. --["Users/sdubois"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2014-05-21T03:11:08Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 138:	Line 138:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 23:11:08'' [[nbsp]] Again, I'd say let's just do it like it's already being done with things like vegan and gluten free concerns. Maintain the Kosher Dining guide page, but not every restaurant that has Kosher food needs to have that on the page. Put the Rabbi info on the Kosher Dining guide as well. A place like the Owl House has vegan and vegetarian food mentioned on the Owl house page because they specifically cater to that. Ben & Jerry's doesn't because it is just an option just they also have vegan, gluten free, low sugar or low fat items. It's totally cool to leave the Kosher listing on the Sabra Grill page because that's obviously something they specialize in. + + Also, I am not sure how I feel about the "we don't have to be concerned about the NYS page" comment you made as that page specifically says that by law, to be Kosher an establishment has to register with that page. Most of the places you say are Kosher are not listed in that database. By rights, they should be removed from the wiki on a "citation needed" concern unless they are re-added with said citation. I'm not going to be the one to remove them because you added them and seem to have an interest and vested concern. So even though I don't know if the info's legit, I figure you care enough so it probably is. My gut is maybe they aren't legally Kosher as defined by law, but they probably adhere to Kosher standards and some in the Kosher communkty accept them so knock yourself out. + + --["Users/badfish"]

Users/BadFish

Damiankumor — 2014-05-21T02:19:46Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 136:	Line 136:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 22:19:46'' [[nbsp]] Let's leave the rabbis then. However if they aren't in the NYS database can they claim kosher? --["Users/Damiankumor"]

Users/BadFish

sdubois — 2014-05-21T01:39:39Z

(quick edit)

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 136:	Line 136:
- ''2014-05-20 21:39:21'' [[nbsp]] And to your latest comment regarding the NY State kosher database, that is not something we need to be concerned with. If we have the relevant kosher information on the pages of kosher establishments, it is up to the consumer to decide if the kosher certification is up to their standards. That is why it is important to mention who the certifying Rabbi is. --["Users/sdubois"]

Users/BadFish

sdubois — 2014-05-21T01:39:21Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 135:	Line 135:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 21:39:21'' [[nbsp]] And to your latest comment regarding the NY State kosher database, that is not something we need to be concerned with. If we have the relevant kosher information on the pages of kosher establishments, it is up to the consumer to decide if the kosher certification is up to their standards. That is why it is important to mention who the certifying Rabbi is. --["Users/sdubois"]

Users/BadFish

sdubois — 2014-05-21T01:38:01Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 133:	Line 133:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 21:38:01'' [[nbsp]] And to your latest comment regarding the NY State kosher database, that is not something we need to be concerned with. If we have the relevant kosher information on the pages of kosher establishments, it is up to the consumer to decide if the kosher certification is up to their standards. That is why it is important to mention who the certifying Rabbi is. --["Users/sdubois"]

Users/BadFish

sdubois — 2014-05-21T01:35:52Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 131:	Line 131:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 21:35:52'' [[nbsp]] The "Kosher Food" page only provides links to the individual pages, it itself does not contain more specific information about the kosher supervision. A vegan/vegetarian consumer simply needs to know that an establishment has vegan/vegetarian food, but a kosher consumer needs to know more information, such as who the supervising rabbi/organization is, if the establishment is meat or dairy, etc. It is worth pointing out that if you google "Rochester Kosher", RocWiki is one of the top links. Having relevant kosher information on pages is not only good for kosher consumers, but certainly also helps the popularity of RocWiki. --["Users/sdubois"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2014-05-21T01:34:53Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 128:	Line 128:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 21:34:53'' [[nbsp]] Also, I took a look at the search engine. Granted I only searched for places within the city of Rochester. Out of the 17 establishments on the Rocwiki Kosher page, only 3 of them were listed on the NYS page. (N.B.: That's NOT a perfect statistic, I did not look at Kosher places that may only have locations in the 'burbs. However there a few places like the Ben & Jerry's at RIT which have a Rochester mailing address even though they are in Henrietta, but didn't show up om the registry. Brownstien's showed up even though they are physically located in Bright--they have a Roch mailing address.) + How stringent are the laws about this? Does Rocwiki bear any responsibility if they list a place as Kosher when it isn't recognized on the NYS page? Is the NYS page really the end-all-be-all? Even if there are no legal repercussions, is it a shitty thing to do to direct these folks who have this dietary concern to an establishment that claims to be Kosher but might not be? (I had no clue this would be such a can of worms.) --["Users/badfish"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2014-05-21T01:21:27Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 126:	Line 126:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 21:21:27'' [[nbsp]] Since the Kosher food page is maintained, hyper-specific mention of it on the individual page isn't needed. Looking at just a sampling of the vegan and gluten free dining guides, I found a vast majority of the restaurants listed on the guide had no dietary mention on the restaurant page itself. --["Users/badfish"]

Users/BadFish

Damiankumor — 2014-05-21T01:06:23Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 123:	Line 123:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 21:06:23'' [[nbsp]] These are the only places that can legally be Kosher in NYS. http://www.agriculture.ny.gov/KO/KOHome.html The have a search engine http://www.agriculture.ny.gov/kosher/search.aspx + --["Users/Damiankumor"]

Users/BadFish

sdubois — 2014-05-21T00:09:39Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 121:	Line 121:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 20:09:39'' [[nbsp]] The kosher information for Rita's is relevant. I maintain the "Kosher Food" page which contains a list of all kosher establishments, including Rita's. Anyone who keeps kosher needs to know who the supervising Rabbi or organization is. --["Users/sdubois"]

Users/BadFish

Damiankumor — 2014-05-20T12:26:25Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 119:	Line 119:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 08:26:25'' [[nbsp]] I don't want RocWiki to get into the figuring out the level of Kosher-ness. There's only so many food related things we can talk about. I'd like to see more content about local going ons instead of restaurants. --["Users/Damiankumor"]

Users/BadFish

jgerek — 2014-05-20T12:16:49Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 117:	Line 117:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-20 08:16:49'' [[nbsp]] Bad: Note that in some portions of our community knowing that an establishment is Kosher is of paramount importance to whether some people will even walk in the door. And knowing the "level" of Kosher, and exactly who "certifys" that fact, is also critical. Often a restaurant will have a few vegetarian items or a few gluten-free items, and may choose to advertise them, but in its truest sense Kosher is an "all or nothing" situation. Noting the basic facts in a wiki post is not "advertising". Please don't condemn one entry because another is or is not complete with other information. --["Users/jgerek"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2014-05-19T20:00:57Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 115:	Line 115:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-19 16:00:57'' [[nbsp]] We note gluten-free, vegan, and vegetarian all the time. I don't see why we can't note that a place is kosher too. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

swagner — 2014-05-01T20:50:51Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 113:	Line 113:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-01 16:50:51'' [[nbsp]] ... specifically, I patterned https://rocwiki.org/High_Falls_Film_Festival, which is way more verbose than I was. --["Users/swagner"]

Users/BadFish

swagner — 2014-05-01T20:46:51Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 111:	Line 111:
	+ ------ + ''2014-05-01 16:46:51'' [[nbsp]] BadFish, you removed a substantial amount of content from https://rocwiki.org/Rochester_Bicycle_Film_Festival with the comment "neutral point of view". Would you mind contacting me at rochesterbikefilm@gmail.com to tell me what was inappropriate in my long description of the festival? I'm new to posts here, and I merely attempted to follow the pattern of other film festivals. --["Users/swagner"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2014-02-26T15:56:05Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 109:	Line 109:
	+ ------ + ''2014-02-26 10:56:05'' [[nbsp]] The Rochesteriat gave me permission to use any of their photos as long as it was attributed to them. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

jgerek — 2014-01-01T20:51:56Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 107:	Line 107:
	+ ------ + ''2014-01-01 15:51:56'' [[nbsp]] BF - Regarding Roch Mentors: Sept 2012 project report was labeled as "Final" - Sponsors indicated that it was a 3-year funded project - Newland's death did not come until a year later in Fall 2013 - I think there was hope to develop a long-term initiative but it seems pretty well gone now --["Users/jgerek"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2013-12-08T23:17:40Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 105:	Line 105:
	+ ------ + ''2013-12-08 18:17:40'' [[nbsp]] I think the ad you removed from the ["Manufacturers Representatives"] page might be okay since it goes to our ["Job Postings"] page rather than an external link. Maybe if we rephrased it in the third person? --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

Damiankumor — 2013-11-15T03:06:58Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 103:	Line 103:
	+ ------ + ''2013-11-14 22:06:58'' [[nbsp]] Agree, I was trying to figure out who that guy was when I saw the edit. --["Users/Damiankumor"]

Users/BadFish

MelodyJaros — 2013-10-08T23:39:47Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 101:	Line 101:
	+ ------ + ''2013-10-08 19:39:47'' [[nbsp]] I realize U of R and just veg restaurants is a narrow focus, though that contribution was simply because that is my area of expertise. I figured other people who are more well-versed on non-vegan restaurants and non-UR bus lines could contribute the more general information on bus navigation. --["Users/MelodyJaros"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2013-10-02T01:25:45Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 99:	Line 99:
	+ ------ + ''2013-10-01 21:25:45'' [[nbsp]] I've actually seen print copies of Crook Book News around. It's legit, not spam. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2013-07-25T19:45:39Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 97:	Line 97:
	+ ------ + ''2013-07-25 15:45:39'' [[nbsp]] She's unbanned but if someone has the password to the acct it'll probly happen again --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2013-07-25T03:50:35Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 95:	Line 95:
	+ ------ + ''2013-07-24 23:50:35'' [[nbsp]] When I saw it, it had not existed before-it was a new acct created by the spammer. --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2013-07-25T03:46:07Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 93:	Line 93:
	+ ------ + ''2013-07-24 23:46:07'' [[nbsp]] Could be someone's old RocWiki account was hacked. That happened with my email account once. Everyone in my contact list got spam emails from my address. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2013-07-24T23:08:17Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 91:	Line 91:
	+ ------ + ''2013-07-24 19:08:17'' [[nbsp]] I deleted it earlier---it was a full page of beauty tips. I may have marked it to delete permanently accidentally-I apologize. Trust me it was spam --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2013-01-08T21:05:30Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 89:	Line 89:
	+ ------ + ''2013-01-08 16:05:30'' [[nbsp]] Badfish---I think you went overboard in what you removed, man. It is now up for discussion on the mailing list. --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2013-01-05T22:23:29Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 87:	Line 87:
	+ ------ + ''2013-01-05 17:23:29'' [[nbsp]] Hey Badfish-hope all is well. Re: Rochester Contemporary...nothing against you specifically but I don't agree with your removal of the scheduling stuff. They're non-profit. I have emailed the list to open discussion on allowing this type of scheduling material to be allowed for non-profits. --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2012-11-13T01:06:47Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 85:	Line 85:
	+ ------ + ''2012-11-12 20:06:47'' [[nbsp]] Maybe it's my monitor, but the table is a mess. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2012-11-08T23:52:00Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 83:	Line 83:
	+ ------ + ''2012-11-08 18:52:00'' [[nbsp]] Sorry about that on ["Jim Alesi"]. Wishful thinking. --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2012-11-01T17:19:40Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 81:	Line 81:
	+ ------ + ''2012-11-01 13:19:40'' [[nbsp]] fixed--thx. I lost track of that --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2012-10-21T01:13:43Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 79:	Line 79:
	+ ------ + ''2012-10-20 21:13:43'' [[nbsp]] I read it over and I agree with Eileen. The article should be fine here --["Users/peteb"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2012-10-21T00:18:42Z

added to my comment

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 78:	Line 78:
- ''2012-10-20 20:15:29'' [[nbsp]] Why did you remove the article about the Public Market? It's a good source of information about the neighborhood and its challenges. --["Users/EileenF"]	+ ''2012-10-20 20:15:29'' [[nbsp]] Why did you remove the article about the Public Market? It's a good source of information about the neighborhood, its challenges, and the ideas people have to improve it. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2012-10-21T00:15:29Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 77:	Line 77:
	+ ------ + ''2012-10-20 20:15:29'' [[nbsp]] Why did you remove the article about the Public Market? It's a good source of information about the neighborhood and its challenges. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

DottieHoffmann — 2012-07-04T20:13:39Z

Revert to version 82 (remove spam comment).

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 77:	Line 77:
- ------ - ''2012-07-04 15:52:07'' [[nbsp]] Hello, - complement of the day,I am JOY,a kind responsible and humble sweet girl from Africa,i saw your profile here and like it.Please reply back at (joyraymond1@live.com) for full introduction of my self,and to send you my pictures.please do not let distance race, or color be barrier for relationship i will love to hear from you soon - JOY. --["Users/joyraymond"]

Users/BadFish

joyraymond — 2012-07-04T19:52:07Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 77:	Line 77:
	+ ------ + ''2012-07-04 15:52:07'' [[nbsp]] Hello, + complement of the day,I am JOY,a kind responsible and humble sweet girl from Africa,i saw your profile here and like it.Please reply back at (joyraymond1@live.com) for full introduction of my self,and to send you my pictures.please do not let distance race, or color be barrier for relationship i will love to hear from you soon + JOY. --["Users/joyraymond"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2012-05-25T01:23:01Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 75:	Line 75:
	+ ------ + ''2012-05-24 21:23:01'' [[nbsp]] Everything in the Strong-Todd house is listed on the ["East Avenue"] page. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2012-05-25T01:16:43Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 73:	Line 73:
	+ ------ + ''2012-05-24 21:16:43'' [[nbsp]] It's not within NOTA borders. I moved it below to the Nearby category. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

EileenF — 2012-02-20T23:46:29Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 71:	Line 71:
	+ ------ + ''2012-02-20 18:46:29'' [[nbsp]] My interpretation of the Interesting Pages List was that it lists pages that are fun, offbeat, or just really cool. There's a lot on there that I would not consider to be well-known Rochester institutions. Bubble tea, for instance, (which I removed) is Taiwanese and is served everywhere. Most people have never heard of Claude Bragdon. The Medina Railroad Museum is just a railroad museum. I guess I see the list as a way for people to also learn about unusual things in Rochester. --["Users/EileenF"]

Users/BadFish

TippingPoint — 2011-12-15T17:15:11Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 69:	Line 69:
	+ ------ + ''2011-12-15 12:15:11'' [[nbsp]] actually what i would do is keep the comment intact and simply remove the mention of his blog out of the comment, and add his blog to the ["Blogs"] page. just my 2 cents. --["Users/TippingPoint"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2011-11-27T22:09:15Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 67:	Line 67:
	+ ------ + ''2011-11-27 17:09:15'' [[nbsp]] BF-an email was sent to the RocWiki General Discussion list about the masseuse issue. --["Users/PeteB"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2011-11-27T01:56:16Z

linked

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 66:	Line 66:
- ''2011-11-26 20:55:39'' [[nbsp]] Why don't we discuss it at the December meeting....I'll add it to the agenda. My concern is there are other masseuse people on RocWiki and NOW you have an issue. Either way please don't delete them until a communal decision is made. Thanks for the reply. Hope you can be there --["Users/PeteB"]	+ ''2011-11-26 20:55:39'' [[nbsp]] Why don't we discuss it at the ["Wiki Community/December 2011 Wiki Meeting" December meeting]....I'll add it to the agenda. My concern is there are other masseuse people on RocWiki and NOW you have an issue. Either way please don't delete them until a communal decision is made. Thanks for the reply. Hope you can be there --["Users/PeteB"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2011-11-27T01:55:39Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 65:	Line 65:
	+ ------ + ''2011-11-26 20:55:39'' [[nbsp]] Why don't we discuss it at the December meeting....I'll add it to the agenda. My concern is there are other masseuse people on RocWiki and NOW you have an issue. Either way please don't delete them until a communal decision is made. Thanks for the reply. Hope you can be there --["Users/PeteB"]

Users/BadFish

EternalStudent — 2011-07-15T20:26:33Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 63:	Line 63:
	+ ------ + ''2011-07-15 16:26:33'' [[nbsp]] It's amusing to come back to the rocwiki world after 4-5 years, but I wanted to put your mind at ease about something you have probably forgotten about entirely -- StarMcKenzie and EternalStudent were never the same person (re: your otherwise much appreciated message to him). I gave what was perhaps an inexperienced description of Bodhi's when I created that page -- but I'm sorry that you interpreted it as some sort of ad from an owner/employee. --["Users/EternalStudent"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2011-01-01T23:22:31Z

Differences for Users/BadFish

No differences found!

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2010-12-30T19:48:53Z

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
- ------ - ''2007-03-30 14:58:38'' [[nbsp]] Fish, discussions about the wiki on content pages ought properly go into Talk pages. In fact, specific code implements Talk and its button. Comments on venues ought relate to the main content as part of the review. I hope i explained that clearly. --["JohnLam"] - - ''2007-03-30 16:19:38'' [[nbsp]] The comment you added, while relevant to wiki is off-topic for the Boulder page. Comments are (generally) used on RocWiki to add a personal insight or review. Your comment was more of a meta-discussion of the Boulder page. This type of discussion belongs on the Talk page. See ["Wiki Community/Talk Pages"] for more info. - ------ - ''2007-03-30 16:52:17'' [[nbsp]] Understood. I pretty much agree, but did the mini-mystery of who was censoring the posts and why become relevant to the establishment? Not sure. --["BadFish"] - ------ - ''2007-03-30 18:25:12'' [[nbsp]] I think it could be relevant because it could be an employee of Boulder that's doing the censoring. No one without something vested in the business would care that much about a bad review. --["KimBee"] - ------ - ''2007-03-30 19:13:44'' [[nbsp]] It not a matter of relevancy, that matter does need to be addressed. The inline comment feature is not the place to discuss these issues. That's what Talk pages are traditionally for. People read the comments to gauge the quality of an establishment's product or service. Not that some user/IP address is a jerk. --["AdamDewitz"] - ------ - ''2007-03-31 10:40:36'' [[nbsp]] Sorry to continue the drama, but I added a comment that someone at Boulder has been editing negative comments about the place. That's really sketchy in my book and would effect my decision to do business with them. --["BadFish"] - ------ - ''2007-04-06 11:18:29'' [[nbsp]] Guess what? I am coming back to Rochester for several weeks. --["BadFish"] - ------ - ''2007-08-07 15:53:01'' [[nbsp]] Mods have the right to remove highly suspicious comments, such as lots of people with near identical writing posting in quick succession from the same IP, particularly a non-sensical one. That's not censorship; it's a vital part of keeping RocWiki troll and spam free. - - Further, at this point, most of what's being posted to ["To Go Taxi/Talk"] is meta-commentary on the commentary process. That simply does not belong there and from past experience, I can say that it's usually necessary to also remove the comments that spawned the exchange, so as to prevent it from coming up again. - - (I am not a mod) --["DaveMahon"] - ------ - ''2007-10-17 17:25:26'' [[nbsp]] I don't know anything about Vinyl, so I tried to edit the page down to "just the facts" after it was so heavily pimped. If you think the page is still wrong, please edit it to make it more in line with the facts. I don't feel comfortable doing that because I haven't been there. Thanks. --["RottenChester"] - ------ - ''2007-10-17 19:36:24'' [[nbsp]] allowing someone to post fictitious statements is apprehensible. you - want to hide behind your curtain go ahead, but that seems like the - cowardly thing to do. - --["JoseSanchez"] - ------ - ''2007-10-18 11:00:55'' [[nbsp]] At the moment, Jose is unable to log in with his first account from any computer. He is also unable to even read the site from his home computer. --["DaveMahon"] - ------ - ''2007-11-16 17:07:04'' [[nbsp]] My intent wasn't to bury the Northfield issue by putting it on the Talk page. I did it reflexively, since we (generally) use Talk to discuss meta issues. I can see from your page here that you might not agree with that as a general rule, so maybe we could discuss it more. - - In any event, it's a temporary measure. We're not done with that entry, not by a long shot. Right now, we're waiting to hear back from Pete, who is checking with the owner. After that, we're probably going to have to remove a bunch of astroturf generated by the people you identified. The end result will probably be some cleaned up comments on a couple of pages, and we'll probably leave the Talk page as a record of what happened. --["RottenChester"] - ------ - ''2007-11-17 16:00:57'' [[nbsp]] I hear you on the issue with talk - it just doesn't stand out. I'll see what I can do... --["RottenChester"] - ------ - ------ - ''2007-12-06 17:19:21'' [[nbsp]] On 2007-12-06 10:33:33 badfish wrote "Phil — quit the sarcastic little comments following MissGia. You look like a jackass. —BadFish" - - And you are what? missy's bitch? --["MrPhil"] - ------ - ''2007-12-07 10:27:48'' [[nbsp]] Not much for criticism, are we badfish? - - You are a deletion machine. --["LanceReed"] - ------ - ''2007-12-07 10:31:10'' [[nbsp]] Lance is mistaken, more discussion is on the Talk page.(It was moved, not deleted) --["BadFish"] - ------ - ''2007-12-08 11:26:06'' [[nbsp]] Oh, i wish i could remember where i saw it. I will search around! You stated something about the resevoir at cobb's hill and that you couldn't have anything with wheels on the path and it upset me greatly. I am moving right next door to cobb's hill in a week and i was excited to go rollerblade with my dog. Uh....when the snow melts, that is!!! EDIT: Found where you posted it. http://rocwiki.org/Dog_Parks--["MissGia"]
Line 80:	Line 32:
- ------ - ''2008-10-07 14:55:02'' [[nbsp]] You're absolutely wrong badfish, please remove that comment. Athena is my friend, and I helped her set up her rocwiki account and she frequently uses my computer. David Alkaher is a very good friend of mine, and I would NEVER use this website to slam his restaurant. Athena has no personal connection to anyone at Virtu, and has every right to state her opinion. But those are not my comments, or thoughts for that matter, and I'd appreciate you removing my name from something that I have nothing to do with. --["Users/kristenfloresfratto"] - ------ - ''2008-10-07 16:27:29'' [[nbsp]] I noted kristen's concern on the virtu page --["Users/PeteB"] - ------ - ''2008-10-08 10:57:07'' [[nbsp]] Hey BadFish, thanks for getting me in trouble with my friend, getting my computer priviledges revoked and announcing to the world that I don't have my own computer! You should be sure of your statements before you make them in a public forum and smear people's good names! And yes, I'm on one of Kristen's computers because I don't have one!!! Jerk... --["Users/AthenaStephanopolous"] - ------ - ''2008-10-08 14:22:28'' [[nbsp]] I may be a bit of a jerk, but my observations are still sound. I did not make anything up, what I wrote was and still is verifiable. I just pointed out info that was already on the Wiki, and none of which created was created by me. --["Users/BadFish"] - ------ - ''2008-10-09 10:49:10'' [[nbsp]] Obviously the lesson learned here is never let someone use your computer to post on this site. I certainly understand the need for overseeing its usage, and I'm sure that people have done all sorts of nasty things that require a warning or some action taken. But it seems that errors can be made by those overseeing, and assumptions can be made based on the information that is made public on this site, i.e. the IP address. Unfortunately for me, that was the case here, and I'm stuck with my name being wrongly accused, as well as my business, in a public place where people IN my business tend to browse. The Wiki contributors who are "watching" us should maybe come up with some other way call people out that is not potentially slanderous, or harmful to friendships and relationships. Possibly email a warning that your activity is suspicious, or post a notice on their userpage? It might prevent you from making mistakes that can prove more costly than you can imagine to the people being accused. --["Users/kristenfloresfratto"] - ------ - ''2008-10-09 20:12:03'' [[nbsp]] Take a look at http://rocwiki.org/Users/BradMandell?action=recall&version=139 his comments before I edited them for the sake of other viewers. --["Users/BradMandell"] - ------ - ''2008-10-09 20:23:39'' [[nbsp]] Sorry, I misunderstood your comment, I thought you were saying I misrepresented what he originally said in my posting. I see your point and will retract the comment altogether. --["Users/BradMandell"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2010-12-30T19:42:18Z

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- I grew up in Rochester. Spent some time close to Rochester in college, moved far away, moved back, moved not very far away, moved back again and now I live far away again. - - http://rocwiki.org/badfish?action=info -

Users/BadFish

BradMandell — 2010-02-16T22:13:31Z

redace names

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 67:	Line 67:
- ''2008-03-06 12:07:51'' [[nbsp]] Badfish I didn't touch the description on the SW Smoke Shop. I was referring to the pictures being oversized in the previous versions. --["PeterBoulay"]	+ ''2008-03-06 12:07:51'' [[nbsp]] Badfish I didn't touch the description on the SW Smoke Shop. I was referring to the pictures being oversized in the previous versions. --["Users/PeteB"]
Line 69:	Line 69:
- ''2008-04-01 14:15:49'' [[nbsp]] Badfish--regarding the issue with your friend and Wild Noodles. Please suggest they call the Entertainment Book company @ 1-888-231-SAVE. Ask for Homer in the Escalation Department and he'll look into the issue. --["PeterBoulay"]	+ ''2008-04-01 14:15:49'' [[nbsp]] Badfish--regarding the issue with your friend and Wild Noodles. Please suggest they call the Entertainment Book company @ 1-888-231-SAVE. Ask for Homer in the Escalation Department and he'll look into the issue. --["Users/PeteB"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2010-01-21T04:46:05Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 127:	Line 127:
	+ ------ + ''2010-01-20 23:46:05'' [[nbsp]] Badfish-I moved your compliment for ["Animal Emergency Service"] to ["Veterinary Specialists of Rochester"] which is the proper name for the facility --["Users/PeteB"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2009-03-02T21:57:45Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 125:	Line 125:
	+ ------ + ''2009-03-02 16:57:45'' [[nbsp]] Mr. BadFish-Just realized it was Erik's page (I blanked for some reason)....thanks for correcting that. I'll just revert it again --["Users/PeteB"]

Users/BadFish

MrRochester — 2009-01-20T21:56:25Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 123:	Line 123:
	+ ------ + ''2009-01-20 16:56:25'' [[nbsp]] No,not interested in others opinions. To each their own. --["Users/MrRochester"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2009-01-20T19:28:36Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 114:	Line 114:
	+ ------ + ''2009-01-20 14:28:36'' [[nbsp]] @Mr. Rochester: + You didn't offend me with anything you said, in fact I have some of the same opinions. The difference is I know when and where to state those things. So it is not about the effect your comments have on me--there is not much of one. + + My point is understand your medium. The cracks I make in person are very different than what I would write on this site. Most readers don't know you or your "sense" of humor as you see it. + + Funny true story of why I posted the comment. RocWiki came up when some friends and I were out for beers. They all read it, but none have a user name and/or posted here, they asked mine, I said I use a pseudonym and they had to guess. The first (anti)guess was, "Oh god, you are not that obnoxious pr*ck, [your former screen name] are you?" I said no and they said "good, I would have lost respect for you." (K, you might not think that is funny, but it is honestly a true story.) + + So post as you wish, no skin off my back. I am just saying you may be making yourself look like a bit of a jackass. --["Users/BadFish"]

Users/BadFish

MrRochester — 2009-01-16T18:07:06Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 106:	Line 106:
	+ ------ + ''2009-01-16 13:07:06'' [[nbsp]] Sorry if I offended your favorite restaurant, I dont live by a PC mindset. But I am entitled to any opinion I want, as you are as well. + + I write whatever I am thinking, because thats what this is, an opinion website. If you dont like my review, skip it. Its a free country. + + Most likely we have nothing in common, come from VERY different backgrounds, and were not raised in a similar manner. Thats what makes the world go round. You should be open to people of all backgrounds and mindsets, Im not saying be a treehugger, but be accepting. None of my posts use profanity or are offensive, they just speak the truth. + + Learn to take life with a laugh and a grain of salt, this isnt cancer, just f-in Rocwiki. --["Users/MrRochester"]

Users/BadFish

MrRochester — 2009-01-14T19:59:19Z

name

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 103:	Line 103:
- ''2008-12-30 13:55:54'' [[nbsp]] Your getting your Italian restaurant names messed up. Pomodoro is on University. Portofino is on W Hen Rd. Portobello is dead. There is also no ('s) on any of these restaurants names. --["Users/SteveVogt"]	+ ''2008-12-30 13:55:54'' [[nbsp]] Your getting your Italian restaurant names messed up. Pomodoro is on University. Portofino is on W Hen Rd. Portobello is dead. There is also no ('s) on any of these restaurants names. --["Users/MrRochester"]

Users/BadFish

alexandergartley — 2009-01-14T14:43:52Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 104:	Line 104:
	+ ------ + ''2009-01-14 09:43:52'' [[nbsp]] Hey, thanks for the comment. I think the solution that ["PeteB"] came up with (move the ["Tanning Salons"] page content to the ["Salons"] page and keep the Tanning Salons page as a redirect) consolidates the information, but still helps people find tanning locations without having to look under 'Salons'. --["Users/AlexanderGartley"]

Users/BadFish

SteveVogt — 2008-12-30T18:55:54Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 102:	Line 102:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-30 13:55:54'' [[nbsp]] Your getting your Italian restaurant names messed up. Pomodoro is on University. Portofino is on W Hen Rd. Portobello is dead. There is also no ('s) on any of these restaurants names. --["Users/SteveVogt"]

Users/BadFish

ReyTucker — 2008-12-02T22:21:25Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 100:	Line 100:
	+ ------ + ''2008-12-02 17:21:25'' [[nbsp]] I call 'em as I see 'em when I see 'em. This should be an interesting discussion. Thanks for the heads-up :-) --["Users/RyanTucker"]

Users/BadFish

AdamDurand — 2008-11-16T06:32:57Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 98:	Line 98:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-16 01:32:57'' [[nbsp]] Thanks BadFish, I've added that info to the Greenway page. --["Users/AdamDurand"]

Users/BadFish

BradMandell — 2008-10-10T00:23:39Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 96:	Line 96:
	+ ------ + ''2008-10-09 20:23:39'' [[nbsp]] Sorry, I misunderstood your comment, I thought you were saying I misrepresented what he originally said in my posting. I see your point and will retract the comment altogether. --["Users/BradMandell"]

Users/BadFish

BradMandell — 2008-10-10T00:12:03Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 94:	Line 94:
	+ ------ + ''2008-10-09 20:12:03'' [[nbsp]] Take a look at http://rocwiki.org/Users/BradMandell?action=recall&version=139 his comments before I edited them for the sake of other viewers. --["Users/BradMandell"]

Users/BadFish

kristenfloresfratto — 2008-10-09T14:49:10Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 92:	Line 92:
	+ ------ + ''2008-10-09 10:49:10'' [[nbsp]] Obviously the lesson learned here is never let someone use your computer to post on this site. I certainly understand the need for overseeing its usage, and I'm sure that people have done all sorts of nasty things that require a warning or some action taken. But it seems that errors can be made by those overseeing, and assumptions can be made based on the information that is made public on this site, i.e. the IP address. Unfortunately for me, that was the case here, and I'm stuck with my name being wrongly accused, as well as my business, in a public place where people IN my business tend to browse. The Wiki contributors who are "watching" us should maybe come up with some other way call people out that is not potentially slanderous, or harmful to friendships and relationships. Possibly email a warning that your activity is suspicious, or post a notice on their userpage? It might prevent you from making mistakes that can prove more costly than you can imagine to the people being accused. --["Users/kristenfloresfratto"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2008-10-08T18:22:28Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 90:	Line 90:
	+ ------ + ''2008-10-08 14:22:28'' [[nbsp]] I may be a bit of a jerk, but my observations are still sound. I did not make anything up, what I wrote was and still is verifiable. I just pointed out info that was already on the Wiki, and none of which created was created by me. --["Users/BadFish"]

Users/BadFish

AthenaStephanopolous — 2008-10-08T14:57:07Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 88:	Line 88:
	+ ------ + ''2008-10-08 10:57:07'' [[nbsp]] Hey BadFish, thanks for getting me in trouble with my friend, getting my computer priviledges revoked and announcing to the world that I don't have my own computer! You should be sure of your statements before you make them in a public forum and smear people's good names! And yes, I'm on one of Kristen's computers because I don't have one!!! Jerk... --["Users/AthenaStephanopolous"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2008-10-07T20:27:29Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 86:	Line 86:
	+ ------ + ''2008-10-07 16:27:29'' [[nbsp]] I noted kristen's concern on the virtu page --["Users/PeteB"]

Users/BadFish

kristenfloresfratto — 2008-10-07T18:55:02Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 84:	Line 84:
	+ ------ + ''2008-10-07 14:55:02'' [[nbsp]] You're absolutely wrong badfish, please remove that comment. Athena is my friend, and I helped her set up her rocwiki account and she frequently uses my computer. David Alkaher is a very good friend of mine, and I would NEVER use this website to slam his restaurant. Athena has no personal connection to anyone at Virtu, and has every right to state her opinion. But those are not my comments, or thoughts for that matter, and I'd appreciate you removing my name from something that I have nothing to do with. --["Users/kristenfloresfratto"]

Users/BadFish

AthenaStephanopolous — 2008-10-03T18:35:30Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 82:	Line 82:
	+ ------ + ''2008-10-03 14:35:30'' [[nbsp]] Thank you BadFish, I did not mean to do that, my comment was deleted and I was looking around the page to see why. Thanks again. --["Users/AthenaStephanopolous"]

Users/BadFish

WillChesebro — 2008-09-03T03:18:31Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 80:	Line 80:
	+ ------ + ''2008-09-02 23:18:31'' [[nbsp]] Park Ave is definitely a great place to cruise. You've got to step it up and start carving up some hills though! The Roc has so much to offer a longboarder. --["Users/WillChesebro"]

Users/BadFish

DaveMahon — 2008-08-27T17:25:28Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 78:	Line 78:
	+ ------ + ''2008-08-27 13:25:28'' [[nbsp]] We already have a ["realtors"] page. --["Users/DaveMahon"]

Users/BadFish

travisowens — 2008-06-09T20:11:48Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 76:	Line 76:
	+ ------ + ''2008-06-09 16:11:48'' [[nbsp]] Thanks for the update about the Pollywogg, I'm planning to revisit them this year and take some pics with my new professional grade camera. --["Users/TravisOwens"]

Users/BadFish

alexandergartley — 2008-05-28T19:05:05Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 74:	Line 74:
	+ ------ + ''2008-05-28 15:05:05'' [[nbsp]] Quick edits don't allow for commenting on edits --["Users/AlexanderGartley"]

Users/BadFish

ReyTucker — 2008-05-15T15:58:02Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 72:	Line 72:
	+ ------ + ''2008-05-15 11:58:02'' [[nbsp]] Your profile was eaten by the migration script; thus, your most recent edit to this page (5/8) is missing. I owe you a beer. --["Users/RyanTucker"]

Users/BadFish

ReyTucker — 2008-05-15T15:56:59Z

Revert to version 45 (aw heck, conversion ate another one. sorry BadFish).

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- I grew up in Rochester. Spent some time close to Rochester in college, moved far away, moved back, moved not very far away, moved back again, moved far away again and now I live here, hopefully for quite a while this time.	+ I grew up in Rochester. Spent some time close to Rochester in college, moved far away, moved back, moved not very far away, moved back again and now I live far away again.
Line 33:	Line 33:
- cowardly thing to do. --["JoseSanchez"]	+ cowardly thing to do. + --["JoseSanchez"]

Users/BadFish

badfish — 2008-05-08T15:30:11Z

cleaned up my profile a little

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- I grew up in Rochester. Spent some time close to Rochester in college, moved far away, moved back, moved not very far away, moved back again and now I live far away again.	+ I grew up in Rochester. Spent some time close to Rochester in college, moved far away, moved back, moved not very far away, moved back again, moved far away again and now I live here, hopefully for quite a while this time.
Line 33:	Line 33:
- cowardly thing to do. - --["JoseSanchez"]	+ cowardly thing to do. --["JoseSanchez"]

Users/BadFish

JamesRowe — 2008-05-07T21:53:30Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- #redirect Users/BadFish	+ I grew up in Rochester. Spent some time close to Rochester in college, moved far away, moved back, moved not very far away, moved back again and now I live far away again.
Line 3:	Line 3:
- '''Note that these "group" pages are not how user groups are defined any more. To define user groups, go into Wiki Settings/Security !'''	+ http://rocwiki.org/badfish?action=info
Line 5:	Line 5:
- '''Note that these "group" pages are not how user groups are defined any more. To define user groups, go into Wiki Settings/Security !'''	+ [[Stats(BadFish)]] + + [[Comments()]] + ------ + ''2007-03-30 14:58:38'' [[nbsp]] Fish, discussions about the wiki on content pages ought properly go into Talk pages. In fact, specific code implements Talk and its button. Comments on venues ought relate to the main content as part of the review. I hope i explained that clearly. --["JohnLam"] + + ''2007-03-30 16:19:38'' [[nbsp]] The comment you added, while relevant to wiki is off-topic for the Boulder page. Comments are (generally) used on RocWiki to add a personal insight or review. Your comment was more of a meta-discussion of the Boulder page. This type of discussion belongs on the Talk page. See ["Wiki Community/Talk Pages"] for more info. + ------ + ''2007-03-30 16:52:17'' [[nbsp]] Understood. I pretty much agree, but did the mini-mystery of who was censoring the posts and why become relevant to the establishment? Not sure. --["BadFish"] + ------ + ''2007-03-30 18:25:12'' [[nbsp]] I think it could be relevant because it could be an employee of Boulder that's doing the censoring. No one without something vested in the business would care that much about a bad review. --["KimBee"] + ------ + ''2007-03-30 19:13:44'' [[nbsp]] It not a matter of relevancy, that matter does need to be addressed. The inline comment feature is not the place to discuss these issues. That's what Talk pages are traditionally for. People read the comments to gauge the quality of an establishment's product or service. Not that some user/IP address is a jerk. --["AdamDewitz"] + ------ + ''2007-03-31 10:40:36'' [[nbsp]] Sorry to continue the drama, but I added a comment that someone at Boulder has been editing negative comments about the place. That's really sketchy in my book and would effect my decision to do business with them. --["BadFish"] + ------ + ''2007-04-06 11:18:29'' [[nbsp]] Guess what? I am coming back to Rochester for several weeks. --["BadFish"] + ------ + ''2007-08-07 15:53:01'' [[nbsp]] Mods have the right to remove highly suspicious comments, such as lots of people with near identical writing posting in quick succession from the same IP, particularly a non-sensical one. That's not censorship; it's a vital part of keeping RocWiki troll and spam free. + + Further, at this point, most of what's being posted to ["To Go Taxi/Talk"] is meta-commentary on the commentary process. That simply does not belong there and from past experience, I can say that it's usually necessary to also remove the comments that spawned the exchange, so as to prevent it from coming up again. + + (I am not a mod) --["DaveMahon"] + ------ + ''2007-10-17 17:25:26'' [[nbsp]] I don't know anything about Vinyl, so I tried to edit the page down to "just the facts" after it was so heavily pimped. If you think the page is still wrong, please edit it to make it more in line with the facts. I don't feel comfortable doing that because I haven't been there. Thanks. --["RottenChester"] + ------ + ''2007-10-17 19:36:24'' [[nbsp]] allowing someone to post fictitious statements is apprehensible. you + want to hide behind your curtain go ahead, but that seems like the + cowardly thing to do. + --["JoseSanchez"] + ------ + ''2007-10-18 11:00:55'' [[nbsp]] At the moment, Jose is unable to log in with his first account from any computer. He is also unable to even read the site from his home computer. --["DaveMahon"] + ------ + ''2007-11-16 17:07:04'' [[nbsp]] My intent wasn't to bury the Northfield issue by putting it on the Talk page. I did it reflexively, since we (generally) use Talk to discuss meta issues. I can see from your page here that you might not agree with that as a general rule, so maybe we could discuss it more. + + In any event, it's a temporary measure. We're not done with that entry, not by a long shot. Right now, we're waiting to hear back from Pete, who is checking with the owner. After that, we're probably going to have to remove a bunch of astroturf generated by the people you identified. The end result will probably be some cleaned up comments on a couple of pages, and we'll probably leave the Talk page as a record of what happened. --["RottenChester"] + ------ + ''2007-11-17 16:00:57'' [[nbsp]] I hear you on the issue with talk - it just doesn't stand out. I'll see what I can do... --["RottenChester"] + ------ + ------ + ''2007-12-06 17:19:21'' [[nbsp]] On 2007-12-06 10:33:33 badfish wrote "Phil — quit the sarcastic little comments following MissGia. You look like a jackass. —BadFish" + + And you are what? missy's bitch? --["MrPhil"] + ------ + ''2007-12-07 10:27:48'' [[nbsp]] Not much for criticism, are we badfish? + + You are a deletion machine. --["LanceReed"] + ------ + ''2007-12-07 10:31:10'' [[nbsp]] Lance is mistaken, more discussion is on the Talk page.(It was moved, not deleted) --["BadFish"] + ------ + ''2007-12-08 11:26:06'' [[nbsp]] Oh, i wish i could remember where i saw it. I will search around! You stated something about the resevoir at cobb's hill and that you couldn't have anything with wheels on the path and it upset me greatly. I am moving right next door to cobb's hill in a week and i was excited to go rollerblade with my dog. Uh....when the snow melts, that is!!! EDIT: Found where you posted it. http://rocwiki.org/Dog_Parks--["MissGia"] + ------ + ''2007-12-10 01:36:17'' [[nbsp]] On ["Woody's"], I'll agree that it was more acid-tongued editorial than fact, but it would still be handy to document the type of crowd in attendance. + + Any idea on how that can be accomplished? --["DaveMahon"] + ------ + ''2007-12-10 11:15:59'' [[nbsp]] Damn. I was hoping that you had a brilliant idea. --["DaveMahon"] + ------ + ''2007-12-10 13:14:02'' [[nbsp]] Thanks for the skiing suggestions! --["RachelBlumenthal"] + ------ + ''2007-12-20 09:12:29'' [[nbsp]] Some internet jukebox's allow for filters based on genre. The jukebox I spoke of in particular used to have no such filters but some were added recently to limit the music available. --["DarrenKemp"] + ------ + ''2008-03-06 12:07:51'' [[nbsp]] Badfish I didn't touch the description on the SW Smoke Shop. I was referring to the pictures being oversized in the previous versions. --["PeterBoulay"] + ------ + ''2008-04-01 14:15:49'' [[nbsp]] Badfish--regarding the issue with your friend and Wild Noodles. Please suggest they call the Entertainment Book company @ 1-888-231-SAVE. Ask for Homer in the Escalation Department and he'll look into the issue. --["PeterBoulay"] + ------ + ''2008-05-07 16:53:30'' [[nbsp]] BadFish-Thanks for the compliments. I hope that you've been back, especially considering that you don't seem to care for my neighbors down the street. --["JamesRowe"]

Users/BadFish

MissGia — 2008-04-08T19:07:56Z

Thanks BadFish. Feel free to email me OFF this site. (Deleted comments)

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
- I grew up in Rochester. Spent some time close to Rochester in college, moved far away, moved back, moved not very far away, moved back again and now I live far away again.	+ #redirect Users/BadFish
Line 3:	Line 3:
- http://rocwiki.org/badfish?action=info	+ '''Note that these "group" pages are not how user groups are defined any more. To define user groups, go into Wiki Settings/Security !'''
Line 5:	Line 5:
- [[Stats(BadFish)]] - - [[Comments()]] - ------ - ''2007-03-30 14:58:38'' [[nbsp]] Fish, discussions about the wiki on content pages ought properly go into Talk pages. In fact, specific code implements Talk and its button. Comments on venues ought relate to the main content as part of the review. I hope i explained that clearly. --["JohnLam"] - - ''2007-03-30 16:19:38'' [[nbsp]] The comment you added, while relevant to wiki is off-topic for the Boulder page. Comments are (generally) used on RocWiki to add a personal insight or review. Your comment was more of a meta-discussion of the Boulder page. This type of discussion belongs on the Talk page. See ["Wiki Community/Talk Pages"] for more info. - ------ - ''2007-03-30 16:52:17'' [[nbsp]] Understood. I pretty much agree, but did the mini-mystery of who was censoring the posts and why become relevant to the establishment? Not sure. --["BadFish"] - ------ - ''2007-03-30 18:25:12'' [[nbsp]] I think it could be relevant because it could be an employee of Boulder that's doing the censoring. No one without something vested in the business would care that much about a bad review. --["KimBee"] - ------ - ''2007-03-30 19:13:44'' [[nbsp]] It not a matter of relevancy, that matter does need to be addressed. The inline comment feature is not the place to discuss these issues. That's what Talk pages are traditionally for. People read the comments to gauge the quality of an establishment's product or service. Not that some user/IP address is a jerk. --["AdamDewitz"] - ------ - ''2007-03-31 10:40:36'' [[nbsp]] Sorry to continue the drama, but I added a comment that someone at Boulder has been editing negative comments about the place. That's really sketchy in my book and would effect my decision to do business with them. --["BadFish"] - ------ - ''2007-04-06 11:18:29'' [[nbsp]] Guess what? I am coming back to Rochester for several weeks. --["BadFish"] - ------ - ''2007-08-07 15:53:01'' [[nbsp]] Mods have the right to remove highly suspicious comments, such as lots of people with near identical writing posting in quick succession from the same IP, particularly a non-sensical one. That's not censorship; it's a vital part of keeping RocWiki troll and spam free. - - Further, at this point, most of what's being posted to ["To Go Taxi/Talk"] is meta-commentary on the commentary process. That simply does not belong there and from past experience, I can say that it's usually necessary to also remove the comments that spawned the exchange, so as to prevent it from coming up again. - - (I am not a mod) --["DaveMahon"] - ------ - ''2007-10-17 17:25:26'' [[nbsp]] I don't know anything about Vinyl, so I tried to edit the page down to "just the facts" after it was so heavily pimped. If you think the page is still wrong, please edit it to make it more in line with the facts. I don't feel comfortable doing that because I haven't been there. Thanks. --["RottenChester"] - ------ - ''2007-10-17 19:36:24'' [[nbsp]] allowing someone to post fictitious statements is apprehensible. you - want to hide behind your curtain go ahead, but that seems like the - cowardly thing to do. - --["JoseSanchez"] - ------ - ''2007-10-18 11:00:55'' [[nbsp]] At the moment, Jose is unable to log in with his first account from any computer. He is also unable to even read the site from his home computer. --["DaveMahon"] - ------ - ''2007-11-16 17:07:04'' [[nbsp]] My intent wasn't to bury the Northfield issue by putting it on the Talk page. I did it reflexively, since we (generally) use Talk to discuss meta issues. I can see from your page here that you might not agree with that as a general rule, so maybe we could discuss it more. - - In any event, it's a temporary measure. We're not done with that entry, not by a long shot. Right now, we're waiting to hear back from Pete, who is checking with the owner. After that, we're probably going to have to remove a bunch of astroturf generated by the people you identified. The end result will probably be some cleaned up comments on a couple of pages, and we'll probably leave the Talk page as a record of what happened. --["RottenChester"] - ------ - ''2007-11-17 16:00:57'' [[nbsp]] I hear you on the issue with talk - it just doesn't stand out. I'll see what I can do... --["RottenChester"] - ------ - ''2007-11-21 19:23:25'' [[nbsp]] Is it really true that you can't have anything with wheels on the reservoir path? I went rollerblading here years and years ago all of the time and never had an issue. I am about to move back to the cobb's hill area and was super excited to be able to do this again. --["MissGia"] - ------ - ''2007-12-06 17:19:21'' [[nbsp]] On 2007-12-06 10:33:33 badfish wrote "Phil — quit the sarcastic little comments following MissGia. You look like a jackass. —BadFish" - - And you are what? missy's bitch? --["MrPhil"] - ------ - ''2007-12-07 10:27:48'' [[nbsp]] Not much for criticism, are we badfish? - - You are a deletion machine. --["LanceReed"] - ------ - ''2007-12-07 10:31:10'' [[nbsp]] Lance is mistaken, more discussion is on the Talk page.(It was moved, not deleted) --["BadFish"] - ------ - ''2007-12-08 11:26:06'' [[nbsp]] Oh, i wish i could remember where i saw it. I will search around! You stated something about the resevoir at cobb's hill and that you couldn't have anything with wheels on the path and it upset me greatly. I am moving right next door to cobb's hill in a week and i was excited to go rollerblade with my dog. Uh....when the snow melts, that is!!! EDIT: Found where you posted it. http://rocwiki.org/Dog_Parks--["MissGia"] - ------ - ''2007-12-10 01:36:17'' [[nbsp]] On ["Woody's"], I'll agree that it was more acid-tongued editorial than fact, but it would still be handy to document the type of crowd in attendance. - - Any idea on how that can be accomplished? --["DaveMahon"] - ------ - ''2007-12-10 11:15:59'' [[nbsp]] Damn. I was hoping that you had a brilliant idea. --["DaveMahon"] - ------ - ''2007-12-10 13:14:02'' [[nbsp]] Thanks for the skiing suggestions! --["RachelBlumenthal"] - ------ - ''2007-12-20 09:12:29'' [[nbsp]] Some internet jukebox's allow for filters based on genre. The jukebox I spoke of in particular used to have no such filters but some were added recently to limit the music available. --["DarrenKemp"] - ------ - ''2008-03-06 12:07:51'' [[nbsp]] Badfish I didn't touch the description on the SW Smoke Shop. I was referring to the pictures being oversized in the previous versions. --["PeterBoulay"] - ------ - ''2008-04-01 14:15:49'' [[nbsp]] Badfish--regarding the issue with your friend and Wild Noodles. Please suggest they call the Entertainment Book company @ 1-888-231-SAVE. Ask for Homer in the Escalation Department and he'll look into the issue. --["PeterBoulay"]	+ '''Note that these "group" pages are not how user groups are defined any more. To define user groups, go into Wiki Settings/Security !'''

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2008-04-01T19:15:49Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 69:	Line 69:
	+ ------ + ''2008-04-01 14:15:49'' [[nbsp]] Badfish--regarding the issue with your friend and Wild Noodles. Please suggest they call the Entertainment Book company @ 1-888-231-SAVE. Ask for Homer in the Escalation Department and he'll look into the issue. --["PeterBoulay"]

Users/BadFish

peteb — 2008-03-06T17:07:51Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 67:	Line 67:
	+ ------ + ''2008-03-06 12:07:51'' [[nbsp]] Badfish I didn't touch the description on the SW Smoke Shop. I was referring to the pictures being oversized in the previous versions. --["PeterBoulay"]

Users/BadFish

DarrenKemp — 2007-12-20T14:12:29Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 65:	Line 65:
	+ ------ + ''2007-12-20 09:12:29'' [[nbsp]] Some internet jukebox's allow for filters based on genre. The jukebox I spoke of in particular used to have no such filters but some were added recently to limit the music available. --["DarrenKemp"]

Users/BadFish

RachelBlumenthal — 2007-12-10T18:14:02Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 63:	Line 63:
	+ ------ + ''2007-12-10 13:14:02'' [[nbsp]] Thanks for the skiing suggestions! --["RachelBlumenthal"]

Users/BadFish

DaveMahon — 2007-12-10T16:15:59Z

Comment added.

Differences for Users/BadFish

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 61:	Line 61:
	+ ------ + ''2007-12-10 11:15:59'' [[nbsp]] Damn. I was hoping that you had a brilliant idea. --["DaveMahon"]