Recent Changes for "WhatchaGotCookin/Talk" - Rochester Wiki

WhatchaGotCookin/Talk

JoannaLicata — 2008-11-23T23:00:12Z

Comment added.

Differences for WhatchaGotCookin/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 26:	Line 26:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-23 18:00:12'' [[nbsp]] '''For further dicussion on shilling, please see the mailing list.''' --["Users/JoannaLicata"]

nathanhenderson — 2008-11-23T21:37:08Z

Comment added.

Differences for WhatchaGotCookin/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 24:	Line 24:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-23 16:37:08'' [[nbsp]] I've been around long enough, thankyouverymuch. I still think this is a slippery slope. Questionable comments that don't violate the bot spam or content restrictions should be flagged and removed by an administrator if necessary. I also don't think it's appropriate to change the Offenses page without discussing it with the RocWiki admin group. Let's continue the discussion on the ["Wiki Community/Mailing List"]. --["Users/NathanHenderson"]

eastsidestephen — 2008-11-23T21:06:42Z

Comment added.

Differences for WhatchaGotCookin/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 18:	Line 18:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-23 16:06:42'' [[nbsp]] I adding shilling to the Offenses page. Let me know what you think. + + The problem with simple flagging the comment and letting users decide is that it will start to clutter things up eventually. If the wiki is full of flags and suspicious information, then it will appear intimidating to new users. + + Those of us who have been around for a while know BS when we see it. It comes with experience. --["Users/EastSideStephen"]

nathanhenderson — 2008-11-23T19:36:51Z

Comment added.

Differences for WhatchaGotCookin/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 14:	Line 14:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-23 14:36:51'' [[nbsp]] Perhaps we need to amend the rules here: ["Wiki Community/Offenses"], as I didn't see anything saying it's okay to delete comments that we think are shills. For all we know, some guy actually loves this place. + + I say if you think it's a shill comment, then call it out on that page with a comment of your own and let our visitors decide for themselves. --["Users/NathanHenderson"]

eastsidestephen — 2008-11-23T17:51:18Z

Comment added.

Differences for WhatchaGotCookin/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 10:	Line 10:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-23 12:51:18'' [[nbsp]] The comment reads like ad copy. It's laid on pretty thick. + + I know sometimes ad copy can be hard to pick out, but in this case it is as clear as day --["Users/EastSideStephen"]

badfish — 2008-11-23T16:21:10Z

Comment added.

Differences for WhatchaGotCookin/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 8:	Line 8:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-23 11:21:10'' [[nbsp]] To be clear, what makes you think it is a shill comment? --["Users/BadFish"]

eastsidestephen — 2008-11-23T06:37:34Z

Comment added.

Differences for WhatchaGotCookin/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 4:	Line 4:
	+ ------ + ''2008-11-23 01:37:34'' [[nbsp]] Nathan - It is obvious to anyone that this is a shill comment. I think we can be about 99% sure that is is BS. I think it is a bad precedent to require such a high burden of proof that we let the wiki get cluttered with phony comments while we worry about some minute possibility that they might be legit. + Let the community be self-regulating. If anyone actually thinks this comment has a reasonable possibility of being legit, please speak up here. + In the past, we have deleted BS comments that were less obvious than this, so I think we can feel safe in deleting this one. --["Users/EastSideStephen"]

eastsidestephen — 2008-11-23T06:30:48Z

created to talk about deletion of the comment in question

Differences for WhatchaGotCookin/Talk

Deletions are marked with - .	Additions are marked with +.
Line 1:	Line 1:
	+ This page exists to discuss the content on ["WhatchaGotCookin"]. Remember that comments can contain ["Help on Editing" wiki markup]. As always, we ask that you review our ["Wiki Community/Etiquette" etiquette page]. + + [[Comments()]]